AlexPontik:
Let’s see:
Mindless bliss, has been tried by many, but it’s not bliss, because if it was, the majority would be doing mindless bliss with drugs, but they don’t. So this one is not realistic, for now.
people physically incapable of laughter is not people in your example, read what you wrote after this…so this is not realistic either for now.
For the church argument, people being able to listen to endless speeches are not people.
You need to assume that people are still people using your imagination as you know people in your lives.
Assuming consciousness transferring, demons and gods, sure we can do that, but I think you should have already understood that we are not doing that. Why? Because if you make such assumptions, how do you know that people are laughing honestly or not?
The problem is that your very premise is not even wrong. Let’s look
The problem is that your very premise is not even wrong . Let’s look at it:
“Imagine a perfect place of endless pleasure where everyone is forever dour vs. a place of endless torture where everyone is uproarously happy.” That is Insane Troll Logic .
Darren_Garrison:
The problem is that your very premise is not even wrong . Let’s look at it:
“Imagine a perfect place of endless pleasure where everyone is forever dour vs. a place of endless torture where everyone is uproarously happy.” That is Insane Troll Logic .
You demon! You sent me to TVTropes! Are you trying to destroy my productivity with genuine laughter??