Phineas Black was a Slytherin and his portrait, presumably with a copy of his personality, did its part to help defeat Voldy and seemed delighted when he was killed.
It’s not explicit, but I always got the impression that Ollivander (the wand merchant) was a Slytherin, too. The whole “Great things. Terrible things, but great” just seems so in line with the Slytherin ethos.
The only problem I have with the whole Horcrux thing being from the get-go is…
Where does Professor Quirrell fit in this process? Where did he get the bit of V’s soul? Why isn’t this ever considered in the later discussions of Horcruxes?
IIRC, that statement was modified a few lines later to “Slytherin has produced more dark wizards than any other house.” Not that every Slytherin is evil. Not that every evil wizard is Slytherin. Just a larger proportion of them than other houses.
I know a writer who actually believes that outlining creates boring stories, and quotes something from Stephen King to prove it. Now I have a rebuttal. Thanks guys.
I always felt she originally intended to do more with Hermoine’s cat, Crookshanks. In the 4th book-CS is mentioned a lot and seems to know which (people/animals) are good while everybody else still thinks they are evil…i.e CS was hanging out with Sirius (while in dog form), and was always trying to attack scabbers (above and beyond the typical cat/rat rivalry)
Also CS knew how to open the entrance to the shrieking shack via the knob at the base of the tree…