Here is a real-life example that shows why sending an ambassador instead of a cabinet minister is a slap in the face:
The Foreign Ministry eventually decided to send Minister of Immigrant Absorption Sofa Landver. But this weekend it declared that Israel’s ambassador to Moscow, Dorit Goldner, would be sent instead.
Russian media outlets reporting on this decision called it a slap in the face to Moscow. Members of Russia’s parliament were also angered by the Israeli decision.
Yes, it is an insult. In spite of all the apologists in the thread claiming that sending an ambassador is “just as good”.
…the links are to stories of the sort that you asked for. This thread is obviously a passive aggressive response to something that has gotten your undies in a knot: but without context it looks like you are getting snotty with someone who has provided exactly what you have asked for. Which makes you look like the dick, not anyone else.
In this case they have a video of a cop telling Thomas he plans to beat him, while Thomas is just sitting there posing a threat to no one. The cop and his buddies then beat Thomas to death. The jury cheerily acquitted them. Thomas was, after all, homeless, so who cares, right?
Well, this just proves it, doesn’t it? The cops are institutionally racist against white people, and every time they see a white person causing trouble they say to themselves “Finally I get to kill me a honkey today”.
Wrong. Whitey gets a pass because he feels guilty about that whole slavery thing. The guilt for that overshadows the guilt of petty crimes. Blackie has never apologized for the slavery thing, and that speaks volumes about his character.
Sorry, I’m still kinda new to this whole racist schtick, but at least I’m trying.
[25 February 2014] DQ'd for purposes of this thread because the victim was not actually killed (he was shot during a traffic stop by a police officer who apparently mistook the cane he was picking up for a gun).
All four killings were, at the very least, questionable. But it still appears from the data as a whole that black people are disproportionately more likely to be fatally shot by police, as this October 2014 ProPublica analysis indicates.
As John Lott has documented, ProPublica analysis is full of fail.
After adjusting for murder rates, black male teenagers are still killed by the police 2.3 times as often as whites. This is a considerable difference — but again, over-representation of urban areas in the data set could be a big part of the explanation.
Screaming “racism!” may attract a TV audience. But uncritically spreading bad information is downright dangerous.
Actually, your linked article doesn’t quite say what you claim it does. Lott does point out the poor quality of the data, which the ProPublica article had already acknowledged. But Lott’s main objection is that he thinks the racial disparity in police killings ought to be normalized for racial disparity in crime rates, which the ProPublica article didn’t undertake to do and didn’t claim to have done.
This unarmed Optometrist was murdered by police in what basically was entrapment after a detective befriended him in a bar and was try to get him for low level gambling over football games:
Cop kills retired Sunday school teacher in church parking lot, he claims she rolled up her window and drove off with his arm caught, at least one witness completely denies that’s what happened.
And it should have done if it was an honest and non-sensationalist presentation of data. And the quality of data is not just poor. It is basically non-existent.