Nothing brings people together like laughter. Progress!
We’re not laughing with you.
Sure, but they all laughed at Bozo the Clown, too.
nice broad brush …
not all activists are alike
.
Think about it …
in order to make the initial nose punch out hole
the airliner would have had to displace aprox 3 tons of mass.
can U dig it?
Being gullible on the internet is not “activism.”
It didn’t require any of those. Simply gravity and understanding even the basics of structural physics. At this point, you’ve been shown counters to everything you have put forth. I haven’t seen you actually take the time respond. I watched your video and gave you the counters to it…counters that don’t actually require one to know that much about either material science or chemistry btw. Did you watch any of the videos I linked too? They talk about basically everything you’ve mentioned in the last few pages. The physics of the aircraft hitting the building and its effects. The effects on the steel and what happened. How a building would collapse. All of them were modeled, all of them have citations attached. All you’ve done is basically handwave and post stuff like the above. Do you wonder why no one takes you seriously? And, here is the thing…you are following exactly the same trajectory as every other 9/11 conspiracy theory Truther that’s come before you. Many in this thread have seen dozens of these folks come and go. They never have anything new to see, never want to take the time to even understand the arguments against what they are saying. They knows what they knows, and they don’t need to know nuffin’ else. You are doing the same thing. When presented with facts you don’t come back with a reasoned argument, instead you either shift to something else or try and mock…but your mockery is just silly and basically, underscores how much you don’t know about any of this stuff.
He didn’t say, “all activists”. He specifically said, “conspiracy theorists”.
Think about it…
did you consider the mass having to be displaced in order to make that initial nose punch out hole? That is the >3 tons of mass I was talking about.
So why is that a problem? You think 2% is significant?
Are you saying the World Trade Center tower had a mass of 2 tons? That’s incorrect. It was 450,000 tons.
as a demonstration of inertia, somebody posted previously
that one could tie a string to a weigh and lift the weight slowly
and there would be no problem, however if the string were jerked suddenly
the string would break, demonstrating inertia.
now think about this … an airplane at 800 ft/sec encounters a stationary mass that it must move in order to make that hole in the tower for the aircraft to enter the building.
now do you see?
I can’t dig it until I see your math. How did you calculate this?
Regards,
Shodan
And? What exactly are you getting at?
No idea what point you think you are making here. Part of the plane and much of its mass continued through the structure. Some of it came out the other side in fact (at least one of the engines were later found to have gone through the entire building). Much of the energy of the impact was translated into the structure (cutting through beams and structural supports, as well as floors, walls, desks and everything else). The outer facade of the building was ‘displaced’ into the building along with the plane, fragmenting and adding to the mass moving through the structure. What do you think happened to it…or was supposed to happen to it? 
you do understand of course
that the term “conspiracy theorist” was invented by the Government
in the wake of the controversy over the JFK assassination …
I see a poster that is confusing “self-evident” with “evident only to one’s self”.
The building structure is the string in the above example.
Now do YOU see?
:rolleyes::rolleyes:
you do understand of course
that the word “gullible” isn’t in the dictionary…