Yes. All the experts agree. Only internet loons dont.
do you really believe that X^2 = X times 4 ?
This is a straight up legit question.
.
If x=2, then x[sup]2[/sup]=4.
Nobody is saying that.
He’s saying if x^2=y, the 2x^2=4y
“All the experts agree” This boils down to a game of
MY experts are better than your experts … ridiculous
there are EXPERTS who have signed up at AE911TRUTH who will argue that the buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition and there are then other experts who will claim otherwise however, what I am saying is that its not ROCKET SCIENCE
anybody who can pass High School science class can figure this out.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Where in the building were the charges placed? And how?
WHY even express anything of the sort?
bottom line here is that the power required to move an object through air
increases exponentially as the speed increases linearly.
what is so difficult here?
Only way to know would be to do a test. Oh wait! Two such tests were conducted in NYC on September 11. Reality trump your 9th grade physics.
Normally I don’t get sucked into these sort of threads but what’s your explanation for all the video and eye witnesses? Of course I don’t expect an answer.
And when? How did they go unnoticed by the 50,000 visitors and workers to the WTC every day?
as i have stated before, any given illusion can be observed and known to be an illusion without the requirement of knowing HOW it was done, suffice to know that it was a trick a FRAUD if you will.
It doesn’t matter if the means had been thermite or black powder, the result is one of such a character as to be unmistakably controlled demolition.
Neither do I, but I’m bored and there’s nothing on TV.
again this goes off into the tangent of how the trick was pulled off
rather than recognizing the facts about the observation that proves beyond any doubt that it was indeed a trick, or FRAUD in this case.
I know I passed high school science as well as many structural engineering college classes. And I think I’ve enough humility to realize I’m still not an expert in the field, but the official story fits with what I know better than whatever nebulous thing you are preposing.
No, how it was done is VERY relevant. You’re the one claiming 9/11 was a fraud. You bring the proof. Otherwise, your opinion is laughable bullshit, as running coach put it. I really think this thread needs to be moved to the Pit.
There’s a crackpot theory that the buildings were empty for months while they were prepped.
And all those plummeting bodies were crisis actors. Or crisis stunt people.
Like I said in the other thread, NYC has been populated for decades with nothing but crisis actors to prepare for that one day.
Why didn’t it collapse from the bottom like a typical controlled demolition?
Nonsence. Making the buildings fall with all the people inside would had increased the casualties and the drama.
" nebulous thing " really? is it “nebulous” in that I state that the alleged airliner would encounter resistance from the moment that the nose touched the wall and also said resistance would cause the airliner to decelerate at such a rate as to be destructive to the airliner. is this not clear?
By the way, when do the laws of physics come into play?
And it was. Are you talking about the non-existent airliner or the real one?