Who DIDN'T like the Beatles in 1964

I knew a guy who was more or less like this in high school. He was a guitarist and loved early Beatles, but when “Strawberry Fields Forever” came out, he thought it was terrible and got right off the bus for this and anything else that didn’t match the 2 1/2-pop song with verses and chorus paradigm.

Me, I’m a big fan of that paradigm, too, and I’m quick to defend it against those who find such songs trifling and insignificant.

And even though, while liking all Beatles eras, I probably lean slightly toward the earlier stuff myself — SFF is, to me, one of the greatest achievements in the history of rock. I was more than willing to follow the more experimental path…at least until it dissolved into pretentiousness and bombast.

Let’s back off sniping, please; next we’ll devolve into full-fledged name-calling and one of you will go all Maxwell’s Silver Hammer on someone’s ass.

We don’t want that.

My parents–who came of age in the 1950s–also held that opinion. In their view, the Beatles’ music (with some exceptions) got louder, druggier, weirder, edgier, and more discordant after 1965 or so.

Came here to post that. Here it is with Allan Sherman getting Dean Martin and Vic Damone to sing along…

Probably when you got back to school following Christmas break?