Given what we know about the “Skull and Bones” who are they are more likely to be pulling for in the upcoming election? I thought they did they favors for one another and it would appear that having a father who was in S&B, as well as president, would have a majority of the power ovre what they do, but then again somebody is fighting also hard to put John Kerry, another S&B member, in the oval office. So ultimately if the Skull and Bones have all this alleged tremendous power throughout the world, wouldn’t this proove that they are only in it for themselves and not in it for the interest of the group as a whole? Thanks.
The Rockefellers have already decided who is to be president, so quit your speculating! 
My Birch/Libertarian friends are promoting the Lib guy (forget his name) but the slogan is No Bones ABout It.
Funny.
Well given their expansive powers, dark dealings and the obvious ass kissing involved I’d say Jacques de Molay. :rolleyes:
It’s an intramural faction fight within S&B. The presidency will go to whichever candidate throws the best keggers. Kerry has a clear disadvantage here.
Have you ever seen the episode of The Simpsons where the aliens Kang & Kudos pretended to be Bill Clinton and Bob Dole? They pretended to oppose one another, but they were really on the same team.
Running a S&B member to be the candidate for both major parties is just like that. It is insurance that no matter what happens, a S&B member will win the Presidency.
Well, then! I believe I’ll vote for a third party!
Go ahead - throw your vote away.
You forgot the maniacal laughter.
The “Skull and Bones” are but a wisp in a gale before the might of the Illuminati.
The CIA! The Vatican! The Zionists! The Freemasons! Evil Aliens! AAARGGHH!!!
I hate to say this as a two-time former Bircher (I didn’t learn the first time) & a Conspiracy buff for lo the past twenty years…
yeah, I think the CFR, TLC, Bildeberg Group & S&B skew “establishment liberal” but I no longer think they are the “Kingmakers” or as dedicated to one side as I once thought & perhaps they once were. (Quigley’s TRAGEDY & HOPE does indicate to me that they one did seem to have a more prominent ‘corporate socialist’ & New World Order agenda, but I’m not convinced it’s as much a driving passion as it seems to have once been.)
So you’re you’re saying there’s no kegger? :dubious:
There may or may not be a Grand Conspiracy, but there’s always a kegger! 
OK, I’ll bite. Who or what are CFR and TLC?
The closest things I could find were Council on Foreign Relations and The Learning Channel. Neither of these seems to be in the same category as Skull & Bones.
.
Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission.
Well don’t blame me, I’m voting for Kodos. :rolleyes:
“Corporate socialist”?
Yeah, a system in which big corporations & big government work together in promoting monopoly capitalism & imposing regulations which keep smaller competitors from becoming a threat to the big corps… this exists to some extent in everything from socialist democracies to capitalist democracies to fascist dictatorshps.
You’re right RE CFR while TLC, as noted by Capt. A., is the Trilateral Commission. They are different from S&B as they are more political discussion/research organization whil S&B is more a secret society with funky rituals, but they are all Establishment organizations.
The… Executioner!?!