If we’re talking just current ‘face’ I think Garnett is right up there, maybe even number one. He’s certainly a lot more recognizable and just as popular as Rondo or Pierce. I’d also put Auerbach on the short list for historic face. Bird is probably comfortably #1, but Auerbach and Russell are tied for #2.
On that line, the current and historic Patriots face is really the two-headed Brady-Bellichek monster (awkwardly wearing a high-fashion shirt under a ripped-sleeved hoodie).
Finally, if we need a face for the MLS Revolution, and don’t have anyone who follows them more, I’ll throw out Matt Reis. His Garnett-like hairstyle is at least recognizable, he’s been around for a while, and was good enough for a brief National Team stint.
I wouldn’t include coaches which is why I excluded Bellichek and Auerbach.
For the Pats I think you could also make a minor case for Steve Grogan, but he’s been so overshadowed by Brady that it’s not worth worrying about.
The more I think of the case for Garnett is probably stronger than the case for Rondo, simply for personality. Pierce has the same problem in that he’s just not that strong a presence, but his longevity has to count for something.
The only Revs player I could name was Alexi Lalas, but he was only with the team for two seasons.
I know how odd it seems- but Texas fans in two cities embraced Nolan Ryan as they’ve rarely embraced any baseball player. He’s ARGUABLY the face of 3 franchises!
I grew up in New York, and disagree with several of your picks.
You’re absolutely right about Joe Namath being all-time face of the Jets, and Tom Seaver will ALWAYS be The Franchise for Mets fans.
But while I loved Phil Simms, most New York fans didn’t (his entire career, fans were ALWAYS cheering for the second stringer behind him, from Scott Brunner to Jeff Hostetler). The face of the Giants is PROBABLY an old-timer like Y.A. Tittle or Sam Huff… but even while Simms was playing, Lawrence Taylor was the
face of the Giants.
The Yankees have had so many superstars and iconic players: Babe Ruth, Joe Dimaggio, Lou Gehrig… but as I’ve always said, for reasons I don’t fully understand, Mickey Mantle had an emotional hold on New York babseball fans that nobody else could match.
For the Knicks, I think it will ALWAYS be Walt Frazier, who had incredible STYLE as well as substance.
I think Tim Lincecum fits a little better. According to the paper he still got the biggest applause in SF during the post-WS parade and the BA loves the seemingly more unconventional just a bit more than the square-jawed choirboy thing. But it is certainly close.
Yaz is a possibility, certainly the face of the franchise for an extended period of time. But he’ll always be overshadowed by Ted Williams. Fisk is beloved but except for that one swing in 1975 he wasn’t nearly as front and center. Jim Rice wasn’t liked enough by anyone to be the face of the franchise for more than a brief period.
Interesting that those three (Williams, Yaz, Rice) played Left Field for the Sox covering 50 years (1939-1989) and all made the HOF. Well, I find it interesting.
I think these are all about right, although I think Yadier Molina is more “the face” of the current Cards than Carp. You could almost make a case for Freese as well, at least with casual fans.
All-Time Blues face could also easily be Bernie Federko.
Not in St. Louis, though. Warner is a pretty clear winner here, I think, although I might be tempted to throw a vote to Isaac Bruce or Marshall Faulk as well.
It would be interesting to see who the “DUH” picks are, where it would be basically unanimous. I don’t think there’d be too many as solid as George Brett.
Bulls: Jordan
SF Giants: Willie Mays
Oilers/Kings: Gretzky
Browns: Jim Brown
Broncos: Elway