John Quincy Adams was a leading voice of abolitionism, and the leader of the founding of the Smithsonian, in his long post-Presidency career in the House.
In recent times, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter were both pretty good. Both do a lot of charity work (although Clinton’s charity work is more flashy and Carters is more low key).
Didn’t LBJ basically say he wanted to drink himself to death after leaving office?
There seems to be a fairly large group who think Carter has done very well as an ex-president. At the same time, there seems to be pretty solid agreement that he did a poor job of BEING president. Why the contrast?
Short answer, which others more knowledgeable than I are welcome to elaborate on:
(1) IMHO he’s somewhat underrated as a President, partly due to the fact that the years 1977-1980 kind of sucked for reasons that weren’t his fault; and
(2) Being a good president and being a good ex-president require different skill sets. His good qualities are/were not, for the most part, the ideal virtues for an effective POTUS, at least as things were during the time he actually held office.