Oh, I definitely like them more when they’re for me.
With 2D hard-ons, I figure that the guy has gone to the trouble of having one and everything, and then gotten it photographed, so the least I can do is be appreciative.
Oh, I definitely like them more when they’re for me.
With 2D hard-ons, I figure that the guy has gone to the trouble of having one and everything, and then gotten it photographed, so the least I can do is be appreciative.
Why wouldn’t he admit it? Naked pictures aren’t that big of a deal, are they? It’s so funny to me that people freak out over that kind of stuff. I’ve sent a few pictures to people over the internet, not completely nude, but close enough. I’ll admit it to anyone, no biggie at all.
Not everyone is uptight about their body.
Well, color me disappointed, cause you’re hot, anyway, ya got’s mail.
slortar, I think I might have preferred that, because then I might have been able to chalk it up to something she ate. The whole running away business is what got me.
Harimad-sol, actually the “Cool. Let’s get to it.” reaction is great. I’ll take hot monkey sex over romance any day! Of course, I’m a guy, so that kind of goes without saying.
One of the girls in my dorm had a subscription to it. I only saw a couple, but they made a lasting impression - and I’m not sure it’s the kind they were aiming for. There’s nothing quite like the image of a naked man sailing a yacht to bring out the giggles to this day. And, in at least one montage, the serious looking, “librarian type” model was using his wang as a bookmark.
Why do you have to go around judging other people all the time? :dubious:
. Thank you and thank you. I’ll check it at home.
And not everyone who is comfortable with their body feels compelled to prove to everyone they encounter just how comfortable with it they are. Different strokes for different strokes, I guess.
or different strokes for different folks, anyway.
You’re the one questioning him because he sent someone his picture. That sounds pretty judgmental to me.
I’m saying I don’t see what the big deal is. I couldn’t care less what other people choose to do with their pictures.
Well, it’s not like I go e-mailing nekkid pictures of myself all the time (though I probably would if asked). I just happened to have that one which was taken at the request of a female friend, and Harimad-sol had posted a joking comment in the Doper photo thread that she was disappointed because she didn’t get a nekkid photo of somebody who’d sent one to Anaamika and I offered mine up as a “consolation” prize. Much to my surprise, she took me up on the offer.
Likely story.
I’m just joshin’ ya. Maybe I’m biased, because the only naked man pictures I’ve ever had sent to me were unsolicited from a very odd man I met playing Euchre on Yahoo. He was, ahem, apparently very excited to be playing with me. Talk about strokes.
Haha, please, no unsolicited nude pictures. That’s why those Yahoo groups skeer me a little.
Maybe his bookworm is nearsighted.
[sub]:g, d & r:[/sub]
'S tha truth! I swear! Besides, you notice that no one’s requested any more from me, so obviously the one picture’s made it’s rounds on the net amongst the female Dopers and they’ve found the image not to their liking!
I was surprised and actually, somewhat impressed. You called me uptight because I don’t want to share naked or semi-naked photos of myself with anonymous strangers on a message board.
I’m dying here. Bookmark wang!
Tuckerfan, maybe they’re just awestruck at your, er, balls. I know we were talking wangs, but man-parts, all good in my book, metaphorical and literal. Seriously, I too was impressed. Naked man pics are few and far between for me. I’m sure if I actually asked, I’d get lots, but I don’t really think I want them.
I should have probably taken an earlier opportunity to say that I think you are a great guy, because now it seems I have ulterior motives, like more naked pics. And…no. Jeans and a t-shirt, remember, are a crowd-pleaser.
Heh, **Misnomer, ** you’re a true humanitarian, appreciating those hard-earned hard-ons.
Yeah, but for some reason, the way my plumbing runs, even the tighest jeans conceal my naughty bits, so if you want to, um, see something, you really have to see something.
Intriguing! Must make a study of this. Impossible to do at present. Even though I sit in front of a handy people-watching window, the fellows here, being college students, adhere to the Great Big Pants dressing method. Every once in a while, one gets to see a guy wearing pants that fit properly (read: the way I like). It’s like winning a free soda. You don’t get one with every twist-off cap.
I have no problems admitting I had a subscription when I was in college. I even survived The Year Of No Nudity. I actually enjoyed it because it was more tasteful than the ever-so-raunchy gay porn that pervades.
I do find, however, that the men go through periods where I think they’re gorgeous, and then thought each and every one of them was a dog.
Now I subscribe to more ethnically-inclined publications.
Esprix
There was a year of no nudity? What prompted that?
Esprix, it’s good to see you!
I’ve bought a few copies of Playgirl for a very simple reason. I was in my early 20s, naive, slightly prudish, and horny. I wanted to look at naked men, and at least see what one looks like, especially the bits one doesn’t normally see. I’m a straight woman. I like looking at naked men and consider naked men in general a good thing. What would be surprising or offensive about that?
CJ