I do what I can. 
My reaction, exactly … and what’s the point of Playgirl without nudity? Even flaccid penii would be better than no penii! When was this horrible Year of which Esprix speaks?
(Why yes, I am aware that “penii” is not an actual word: I’ve always liked it better than “penises” – and “penes” just looks like something else entirely – so I’ve decided that I can use it if I want to. 
)
A guy’s gotta be packing a serious length of hose if normal garments reveal his manhood. Denim isn’t terribly stretchy, so I would imagine very tight jeans are just going to produce extreme squashing and be awfully uncomfortable; kind of like the ace-bandage-around-the-bust phenomenon. This fellow wears boxers and easy-fit khakis primarily for practical reasons. If tight jeans come back in style, I will be very comfortably out-of-fashion.
From my first link, back on p.1 of this thread:
Could somebody send me Tuckerfan’s pic?
Just make sure it’s not a picture of Braaaaaaad instead.
Thanks!
(You had four links in that post, all of which seemed to be merely cites for the numbers you provided, so I didn’t bother clicking any of them. I trust you’ll forgive me for taking your word for it. ;))
In 1986 I wasn’t old enough to buy Playgirl. 
I turned 15 that year, and was a bit of a late bloomer: I don’t think I even knew that such a magazine existed!
Well, to be honest, I’m looking at general body shape, not what he’s packing. I have had moments looking at fellows in tight jeans, thinking there’s no way that can be what I think it is. Nothing wrong with being comfy, but I maintain that enormous pants just don’t do one justice.
I bought a Playgirl once.
It had a big picture of Matt Damon on the cover.
Playboy cover girl = At least partial nudity to follow that includes pics of said covergirl.
Playgirl cover boy = FALSE ADVERTISEMENT
not one stinkin’ nudie pic of Matt in the whole thing
I think Playboy is an awesome magazine. I really like the articles and the editorials.
Lordy, was it really 1986? I’m so dating myself… 
Esprix
(P.S. I still have all the issues from the years I subscribed.)
Playgirl can be quite useful when one is dating oneself.
I also want Tuckerfan’s pic but didn’t want to come off creepy by asking for it. Luckily gobear was there to take up the creep factor.
Oh, and if you want to see Matt Daomn in all his glory, rent The Talented Mr Ripley which includes as a bonus Jude Law naked.
If there are nude pictures going around, send them to me!
I’ve read some Playgirls, but the guys there usually aren’t my type, so there was no incentive to buy them. Plus, I can find nearly anything I want to look at online for free!
Oh, yeah. This is what I find way, way hotter than total nudity.
And if any of you happen to know that this model is gay, please, there’s no reason to tell me! Don’t spoil my fantasies without just cause.
Equality ain’t creepy. If the gals are getting an eyeful, they should share with the rest of us.
Not like you were gonna get to sleep with him anyways…
How could any info spoil a fantasy? When I see something I like, he could be an illiterate homosexual Republican slave-owner and it wouldn’t change one thing about how he looks. One of my very first threads here was about the last Playgirl “Real Man of the Year,” and of course some folks felt compelled to jokingly point out that he was probably gay. I don’t know why they thought it would matter. 
Lots of people like to read Playboy - actually it’s one of the most competitive writing markets in the country, even more so than many women’s magazines. Playgirl, on the other hand… Well, I’ve actually written for Playgirl - recently, in fact - which may or may not tell you something about the quality of their prose. Fortunately, I’m a new author with them, so I’m not yet responsible for the declining quality of their articles. :o
Given a choice, I’d rather read Playboy than Playgirl. The expressions on some of the models’ faces in Playgirl is just hilarious. Somehow the “come-hither” look just doesn’t seem to work as well when it’s on a man’s face versus a woman’s. Don’t know why, though.
Well, no. But sour grapes here - he probably sucks in bed, anyway.
Very true.