[QUOTE=BarnOwl]
Petraeus isn’t so naive that he’s unaware of Bush’s hiring/firing practices.
I doubt he’s afraid of being axed for speaking his mind.
My concern is that as the general in charge, it will be extremely hard (if not impossible) for him to admit he has failed. Which is why, he shouldn’t be making the call.
[/QUOTE]
If I heard Bush publicly pledge that he would not fire Petraeus for issuing an unfavorable report, maybe I’d feel more confident in its truthfullness. Even then, I’d want a third party that’s independent of the administration to evaluate those claims.
[QUOTE=Blalron]
If I heard Bush publicly pledge that he would not fire Petraeus for issuing an unfavorable report, maybe I’d feel more confident in its truthfullness. Even then, I’d want a third party that’s independent of the administration to evaluate those claims.
[/QUOTE]
You heard Bush pledge he’d get bin Laden
You heard Bush pledge he’d rebuild New Orleans
You recently heard him pledge to rebuild Greensburg, Kansas
And now you’d feel more confident in its truthfulness if he publicly pledged he wouldn’t fire Petraeus for issuing an unfavorable report.
You’re a Republican, right?
[QUOTE=Subterraneanus]
And, apparently, The Determiner™.
[/QUOTE]
Ctually, I think it’s spelled Determinator.
[QUOTE=BarnOwl]
You heard Bush pledge he’d get bin Laden
You heard Bush pledge he’d rebuild New Orleans
You recently heard him pledge to rebuild Greensburg, Kansas
And now you’d feel more confident in its truthfulness if he publicly pledged he wouldn’t fire Petraeus for issuing an unfavorable report.
You’re a Republican, right?
[/QUOTE]
I meant this humorously Blalron. Honest.
Hope I didn’t hurt your feelings.