First of all, let me explain that this bet was only for one dollar, so its mostly about the pride and stubborness of the parties involved. But I wanted to get some relatively unbiases opinions on the subject.
Parties A, B, and C are engaged in a discussion about soccer when Party A and Party B decide to make a bet on whether Party C (who knows very little about sports, especially overseas soccer) can name a single Italian soccer club. Party A is betting he can name one, Party B is betting against it. Before asking Party C, the stipulation is made (and this is as close the exact wording as anyone remembers) that “he can’t name just the city.” So C says Roma, and both A and B think they have won. A thinks so on the grounds that he didn’t say “just the city name” he said the common name of the club. B says that he named “just the city name” and in order to win the bet he would have had to provide further information than just “Roma” since that is the name of the city. In this case the full name of the team would be AS Roma. I’m not sure what the AS stands for, but I assume its similar to the FC which stands for Football Club in many English teams names. Party B concedes that if C had said Lazio, another team in Rome, he wouldn’t have had to use these indentifying initials, as Lazio is the common name of the team, and not the name of the city.
As far as I know, the common names of soccer clubs are generally in one of three styles.
First, teams that are simply the city name. Ecamples include Roma and Bacelona. These teams have FC or some equivilant in the proper name, but everyone calls them the city name.
Second, teams that have the city name and another part, like Manchester United and Inter Milan. These clubs could not be readily identified with just the city name as there are other clubs that use that same city name, like Manchester City and AC Milan, in their common name.
The third type does not involve the city name, like Arsenal or Juventus. These are not really relevant to the bet.
So Party A’s argument hedges on the assumption that the extra condition on the bet was to prevent C from saying Milan and getting credit for either Inter Milan or AC Milan. Party B’s argument hedges on the assumption that to satisfy the condition, Party C would have had to go beyond saying “just the city name” and since the city name and the team name were the same thing, and thus would have to have said “AS Roma” instead of just Roma.
So what’s your opinion? If you have any other questions, I’ll be glad to answer them.