Now it’s been shown in lab tests that female midgets exhibit packlike mentality and have been known to take down predators many times their size, much like the fearsome killer ants of Argentina.
But I’m going to go with the grizzly bear. I’m not sure how he puts on his black belt or uniform but his claw attack and key breathing should prove decisive. He’ll have the mental discipline to withstand lethal blows and the presence of mind to maneuver through multiple attackers.
As soon as Mr Grizzly tried a kick he’d fall flat on his ass, the midgets would then swarm all over him and beat him to death with socks filled with wet sand.
Anecdotal information suggests that the midgets would win. I base this on experience gained from having a 4’10" wife. If they were also Lebanese (as she is) - I would feel sorry for the bear and all bear-like objects in the area.
If the venue is a wood or a forest I fancy the bear, no question. Familiarity with the terrain, ferocity of attitude and superior fur quality should see him emerge triumphant.
However, if the chosen theatre of operations is a crowded McDonalds restaurant crammed with customers trying to buy Cheese Royales (heavy on the cheese) at lunchtime, I’d have to jump ship and go with the midgets. There are several reasons for this:
a) It is far easier to manoeuvre around a burger joint full of people if your centre of gravity is low. 1-0 to the midgets.
b) The midgets would be able to jump on customers’ heads, wait for the bear to walk past and then take him by surprise. Bear 0, midgets 2.
c) The bear would be distracted by the smell of burgers. It would go into the kitchens, eat some burgers and employees and then fall asleep because it can’t eat any more. The midgets would soon take advantage of this scenario.
It would depend on what the bear is wearing. Research shows that even bears at black-belt level tend to get tangled in their gi and fall down, giving the advantage to the midgets.
The naked (well, fur-clad) bear, on the other hand, would have its natural agility, large claws, sharp teeth, and ferocious +12 bad breath as weapons. In that case, I’d go with the bear.
What I want to know is what kind of fiend would take nature’s killing machine and make it even more dangerous by teaching it martial arts?!? It’s like giving a shark a bazooka!
Contrary to what most people say, the most dangerous animal in the world is not the lion or the tiger or even the elephant. It’s a shark riding on an elephant’s back, just trampling and eating everything they see.