Actually, now I want that as my sig.
I’m always bemused to learn of posters who have been here for a long-ass time that I was previously unaware of who turn out to be huge retards.
Because I’m sincerely concerned that you might blow a gasket, I’m going to give you an honest, truthful, non-snarky answer.
If you want to debate that topic, go to Great Debates. This thread is for Pitting Obama worshipers and Bush haters. If you don’t want to participate, then please don’t. But I assure you I, at least, will not be addressing (here) the questions you pose.
In actuality , neither would I. It was just something I would say while all that shit was coming down from DC and they would continue their lies. Venting I guess, and a way to express just how criminal I thought they were. If we as a people had taken to the streets to remove them for office I would have been okay with that. IMO they betrayed their oaths of office.
So you admit you were not satirizing but trolling? That’s against the rules.
it’s not my fault that Obama walks on water, heals the sick, while Bush sacrificed babies at alters and allowed spinning during White House Foosball tournaments. That doesn’t make ME stupid.
Me too! But I’m surprised you hadn’t noticed Diogenes the Cynic before.
Touché.
Granted.
Obama worshipers don’t exist. And Bush has earned all of the hatred anyone has ever directed at him. He’s probably earned more, if it comes to that. But the point is, why would anyone want to Pit people who are giving him that hatred he’s earned?
No, still not trolling. Still not against the rules.
Tell you what, why don’t you take every insult, thinly veiled or blatant, in this thread and in all other Pit threads active during the past week, line them up in a PowerPoint presentation, and identify which insults constitute trolling and which do not. Or more specifically, which posts constitute “posting of inflammatory comments solely to get a rise out of people.”
If every single “inflammatory comment(s) solely to get a rise out of people” were to be deleted from the Pit it would practically cease to exist.
I’ve specifically addressed your OP and made a serious point about Bush haters.
Unless you think hatred itself is unreasonable , which is a philosophical point that is likely beyond you, I’ve pointed out that Bush hating is not necessarily an unreasonable or stupid position.
Maybe that helps because it would seem that if hating Bush is not stupid then the nameless Obama worshipers must be more stupid. Maybe that means you win.
Can we have a discussion about whether those who were glad to have Bush, a good Christian, in the white house, were more stupid than those who worship Obama are? I have some ideas on that.
Oh but you are funny!! I wish we had a “laugh” smily, because you deserve a whole flock of spidey laughies!! But, sadly, you’ll have to do with these…
(:rolleyes:) (:rolleyes:) (:rolleyes:)
You’re the one alleging facts and refusing to prove them. You know that you can’t. I see that you’re now alleging that I personally think Obama is the Messiah. This is one instance where I really can say that my post is my cite. I do NOT think Barack Obama is the Messiah, nor do I worship him or anything else.
I also think it’s pathetic that you don’t have the balls to answer the birther question.
With all due respect, not here. If you want to start a Great Debate or your own Pit thread then please do, but I’m not going to engage you, on those topics, here.
And just so you don’t accuse me of a bait & switch, just want to let you know that I probably won’t engage you on those topics elsewhere either. Nothing personal, I’m just not interested in having a message board debate about them.
Spinning? Spinning? And they called US un-American! :mad:
Well, if it’s such a laughable assertion surely you can prove that it’s not true. Point me at a dozen Obama-worshipers, and I’ll concede both points (that they exist, and that they exist in numbers large enough to make my assertion laughable).
(:dubious:) (:dubious:) (:dubious:) My spiders are dubious about the proposition that you can manage it.
Ahhhhh… yet another thread devolves into a pissing match between Diogenes the Cynic and whoever isn’t Diogenes the Cynic. Your predictability is your weakness. We could go back and forth all day, “cite”-ing and “proof”-ing and referencing previous posts and you’d still be all the stupidest.
I know that in an attempt to get me to engage you’ll call me names, level insults (Polycarp? you watching?), and other inflammatory comments solely to get a rise out of me (Polycarp? hello?), then thump your chest and think you’ve “won”. And nothing I can do or say (Poly…, ah, nevermind…) will change that, so I’m not going to let it bother me.
So have at it Dio. But remember, if you’re not in a pissing *match *then you’re just pissing into the wind. And may I suggest a strong and steady stream, aimed high.
Coward.
…
I think I will just take your word on that one. 