No, that’s actually not how it plays out.
But enjoy your victimhood.
Thanks for that link. It seems reasonable at first…so I checked on the 2020 election thread there… Some liberals putting up a good fight, using reason and the facts as are known. Pretty ugly pileons tho. Use the Supreme Court as a reference and “hes a troll!!”
The pit has existed for decades and has been used by some of you for decades in order to slander others. Stop acting as if people responding to the assholes that have used the pit to attack 100s over decades of time are the bad guys and gals. It’s almost as farcical as asking for a cite.
Ah, poor poor Octopus.
It’s not that you have to be an asshole because we are so very very mean to you. It’s that you want to be an asshole, and use any justification that you can to rationalize it.
Hah! I couldn’t satirize you if I tried.
Yes, of course. Equality of outcome. Not across ALL demographics, but certainly across all demographics as large as racial groups. What else could equity possibly mean?
If you picked two groups of ten million random Americans, the sample size would virtually ensure that they would be nearly identical in terms of average income, educational level, life expectancy, and other demographic statistics.
However, if you contrasted groups of ten million white and black Americans, you would find that the whites were far wealthier and better educated, while the blacks were much more likely to have served time in prison and had shorter life expectancies.
If you start from the assumption that race is completely irrelevant and that all people are unique individuals, how can you possibly explain this other than as a function of institutional and structural racism? Every other possible explanation is racist, in that it assumes black people are in some way objectively inferior.
For example, conservatives often try to blame it on “gang culture”, teenage single mothers, obscene rap music, whatever. Translation: black people are more likely to make unwise sexual choices and glorify violent criminals than white people are. It’s the assertion of racial inferiority disguising itself with “race-neutral” language.
So, if we observe that equality of outcome is not happening, we know that structural racism must be the reason and we need to be working on that. How will we know that we don’t need to worry about racism anymore? When equality of outcome is observed.
Bizarrely, conservatives claim that the people noticing and pointing out the structural racism are being racists, and that the truly “anti-racist” position is to assert that we live in a “color-blind” society, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
One of the things that kills me the most about that site is that they don’t allow links. Makes it more difficult to actually back up one’s point.
Equality of outcome between genders is impossible. Should policy be changed to set up quotas and limits in order to engineer gender equity?
No. What “we” don’t like (and I thought you were all about treating people as individuals and not part of a group, so I don’t know where this “you folks” comes from) is when, instead of taking an opportunity to answer questions and delve into an informative and possibly mind-changing discussion for all sides of an issue, you refuse to answer good faith questions about your position, and instead start whining that every disagreement with you must as a matter of course be because of some inherent “liberal bias”.
Perhaps you could try lead by example the way out of this tragic state of affairs?
OT but I wanted to edit: some libs over there are kicking ass, using logic and facts to back themselves up. I have a discus account but not sure I could deal with that level of hate. It makes the pit here seem like a love fest.
I don’t think he wants to debate in good faith or with good reasoning, any more than I actually want to spend years studying the arcane arts so that I can throw fireballs. I just want to pretend like I’m doing that, for entertainment, just like octopus wants to pretend like he’s doing that.
It’s not about debating in good faith; it’s not about using good reasoning. It’s about cosplaying the heroic intellectual maverick in hostile territory.
Nobody denies there are actual biological differences between men and women; they’ll never going to have the same average muscle mass or be equally likely to get pregnant.
But most people do deny there are significant biological differences (other than skin tone) between racial groups. So the analogy fails.
Why is that?
Well, first we have to understand why someone would believe that women are not as capable of men. Then we can work to alleviate that issue.
Admit it. If you could, you would.
I would, anyway.
Too lazy.
Take the NBA all stars and put them against the WNBA all stars. Who wins? The party of science obviously is very selective when it comes to biology.
Is sports the only place where women are represented? Talk about being “selective”.
Come back to me when you can explain why women are not as good at science, business, or any of the other myriad jobs where women are underrepresented and underpaid.
A woman lacks the upper body strength to be a proper particle physicist.
You joke, but not all particles are light.
You hurt my head! 