Why are even PBS documentaries made this way (content stretched way out)?

I was trying to watch a documentary that sounded interesting, called First Peoples (actually I guess it’s a series). This episode was about how Homo Sap apparently got to Asia much earlier than was previously thought, and the other human species they encountered there.

But boy did they pad out the information to fill up time. Repeated scenes of ancient people walking; repeated map graphics; narration done in portentous tones. It was finally too much, I gave up after 30 minutes in a 2-hour show. I had to check to make sure I wasn’t watching one of those Ancient Mysteries shows, the treatment seemed just as over-padded.

Does PBS really need to stretch out its few serious programs like this? They could have covered the material with plenty of talking heads in half the time. “We dug and dug, and we finally (blah blah blah) found a little finger bone. Look, here’s a 5x enlargement done by a 3D printer. Here it is in the original size. It’s just a tiny bone from a child, maybe 5 or 7 years old (blah blah blah). The child turned out to be female. The bone is surprisingly robust in size considering the sex and age of the person. Blah blah blah (ad nauseam) Denisovan.” And it’s not like you could fast forward through it, you wouldn’t know where the interesting bits were.

They need a TLDW version, maybe they could put it online for those of us without the patience to sit through 2 hours of a 1-hour (or less) show.

There’s already a thread about this series. You missed the episode on the Americas, in which they wasted a half hour on a theory, only to disprove it.

I suppose PBS allows for having no commercial breaks or time limitations.

I find most Ken Burns documentaries to be way too long…

I feel you. I’ve about given up on TV documentaries, because they spend half their time talking about the researchers and their preparations, rather than the subject I want to learn about.

ETA: I think we were all spoiled by David Attenborough.