Why aren't pro-lifers killing abortionists?

I don’t see the identity of the person as being relevant to whether it is murder or not in that situation.

But you’re not pro-life. If you were pro-life you would probably respond that if you’d done something to be iun that position then you’d have a responsibility to keep me alive and if you disconneted me that would be murder. I don’t think that because I’m pro-choice but thats probably what they’d say.

If you were a strong pro-lifer, would you think abortion is murder?

I think you have to understand that most pro-lifers don’t actually believe that the baby is equal in importance to the mother.

Most believe that the baby is a potential life, and has human worth immediately.
This is why many pro-lifers will oppose abortion ‘on tap’, but will be willing to allow an abortion if the mothers life is threatened.
The baby’s/foeti’s???/blasto-whotsit right to life overrides the mothers right to ‘convenience’ but not her right to life.
Therefore an abortion doctor while a truly evil man, has a greater right to life then the babies he is killing.
Thats my understanding anyway.

On the other hand, if you ask Des Trihs, I’m sure he will tell you it’s because they keep trying and missing.

You seem to be the only pro-lifer in this thread. May I ask, if you think abortion is murder then why aren’t you killing abortionists?

I try not to presume with certainty that I can tell what other people think. Your argument is based on a logical error. It is not a requirement for a pro lifer to think that abortion is murder. It is possible to think of it as a morally regrettable decision, or to think that it is something that should not be legally permitted, without thinking it to be murder.

And once you realize your first statement is logically flawed, the rest of the argument, requiring all pro lifers to be gun and bomb toting vigilantes to be consistent in your eyes, also falls.

Why don’t people who demand answers to questions like this start 500 threads a day? It’s not like there’s great effort involved, and if the issues are that important, don’t their beliefs (if they are sincere) demand they take it to a ridiculous extreme? If not, why not?

Read post # 12

If it’s actually murder or not, yes, but the ability to commit that murder could depend on if it is your own child or a unidentifiable person.

Why don’t people opposed to the genocide in Dafur take up arms against Sudanese troops? Why don’t people opposed to female genital mutilation kill fgm cutters? Why don’t people opposed to the death penalty, kill prison wardens? Why don’t people who think global warming will kill millions of people shoot SUV drivers?

Is that supposed to be bad?

Personally I consider inconsistency to be an important human – and very humanely - trait.

The pro-life movement constantly uses the word “murder,” so I don’t think that’s a false representation.

I’ve asked the OP’s question more than once. I don’t think I’ve ever gotten a really clear answer except that they think it would ultimately be counter-productive in their longer-term strategic goals.

Even if they don’t think it would work as a strategy, I think it’s still fair to ask whether they think it would be immoral.

Two scenarios:

A. You have a gun and you see somebody raising a knife about to stab and kill a toddler. Is it morally permissable to kill the stabber to save the toddler?

B. You have a gun and you see a doctor about to perform an intact dilation and extraction procedure ( a so-called “partial-birth abortion”) on a woman who is 4 month pregnant. Would it be immoral to kill the doctor to stop the abortion and save the fetus? I’m not asking if it would be a good political strategy, or if you would do it, just if it would be immoral. If you really think the fetus has the same human rights as the toddler, then what’s the moral difference between shooting a person who’s trying to kill either one of them?

I think that, whether they admit or not, most lifers don’t really believe that a fetus is the same as a born baby.

Well the question was whether it was murder or not. Hence me answering that question. My apologies for not peering into your mind to determine what question you thought I should be answering.

Of course it would alter whether I could do it. But it wouldn’t be commiting murder either way.

I’m sorry but I don’t follow. Those pro-lifers who genuinely beleive an embryo is the equivalant of aborn human are forced by their own premises to conclude that abortion is murder. They have no logical basis for considering it to be anuthing else. You can conceive of situations were abortion wouldn’t be murder and would instead just be regrettable but thats because youre not pro-life. Pro-lifers who think embryo’s are as important as people do not share your premises and cannot logically reach the same conclusion. I’d be surprised if there are any pro-lifers anywhere who think embryo’s are human beings who dont think abortion is murder.

But anyway, this is all a completely moot point. Its no secret thhat there are millions of pro-lifers who do consider abortion to be murder (or at least they say they do). They’re very vocal about it. Just type “Abortion is murder” into Google and you’ll find thousands of web pages and opinion columns arguing this very thing. Why arent those people killing abortion doctors?

To the OP: Because in America at least, the climate is too peaceful and the rule of law too thorough and valued to take up vigilante practice. Like it or not, they will be found, incarcerated, and depending on the state, probably executed. Beyond that, many fear direct retaliation from the targets. I know that that if I worked in such a hostile environment, I would go armed. I suspect more doctors and clinic staff do likewise than you might think. Lastly, they know that murder is wrong, and don’t want to lower themselves to the level of the people they are protesting against. Few of them really believe that there is an active campaign of destruction going on. It would make more logical sense to kill the mothers, than the doctors.

If you are pro life then killing is wrong. Therefore they would never do such things to be consistent.

Are you suggesting they should ?

I was under the impression that some of the so called Pro Lifers already had murdered Doctors etc.which is why I find their self chosen title as pure hypocrisy.

I am defacto pro-choice.

I do think abortion is wrong…and could even be murder.

However, I don’t KNOW that it is and wouldn’t be so arrogant as to assume that I am 100% correct.

Therefore, I have to defer to the consensus…and so am defacto pro-choice.

Sometimes they are. From Wikipedia:

What consensus?

I’m arguing that it would be immoral not to kill abrtionists if u believe abortion is murder. Pro-lifers say that abortion is murder but very rarely do any ofthem attack abortionists. i therefore conclude that the vast majority of pro-lifers do not really beleive what they say they believe.

If you think President Bush lied about the war and therefore got thousands and thousands of Iraqi civilians killed, why didn’t you pick up a rifle and assassinate President Bush? If you have a gun and see someone about to stab a toddler, you’d be moral to shoot the stabber, right? If you have a gun and see someone about to get on the phone and order a general to drop bombs on Baghdad which is home to many toddlers, you’d be moral to shoot the president, right?

So why didn’t you try to kill President Bush? Too scared? Whaaaaa, I’m too cowardly to assassinate the president! Whaaaa! I’m a hypocrite! Whaaaaa!