So why can’t ugly people act and subsequently never get roles in television series’ and movies? I’ve never seen such gross underrepresentation of a group by an organization…well, maybe black people in hockey; but hockey has at least a few black people. In Hollywood, even those intended to be ugly–“Ugly” Betty–aren’t.
Certainly Hollywood producers and directors would hire the most talented candidate regardless of physical appearance.
While the young stars (the sex symbols) of British TV shows are usually just as attractive as their American counterparts, I find that the people intended to be old and ugly often really are. I think those actors usually have a lot more character.
Are you seriously maintaining that ugly people can’t act and that’s why we don’t see ugly people in Hollywood productions? Really? You think that it’s more likely that there’s a genetic link between good looks and acting ability, or perhaps a genetic component that links ugliness to a lack of acting ability–and that either of those is more likely than casting directors preferring to hire pretty people?
If so, interesting* premise.
Welcome to the Straight Dope.
Leave ignorance at the door, lest it be wrested forcefully from your brain.
No. I’m maintaining that casting directors, et. al., hire, for the most part (as shown, some ugly people do make it into films), pretty people even though acting is a “performance” art. My OP is mere sarcasm designed to fool certain individuals.
Thanks
You’ll not have my ignorance without a tenacious fight!
I dare you to prove to me they’re actors. I mean, bad acting is one thing, but those guys were, I think, picked BECAUSE they were ugly, not because they could act. The guys who play Julian and Bubbles are third-grade-Christmas-pageant bad.
You don’t get a role, even a minor one, in a TV show or a movie without working your way up through the industry. Before every big role there are years of high school and college drama, off-broadway theater, theme park gigs, voice-overs, talent shows, and commercial spots. Each one of things is a gate and how you look has an effect on how easy it is to advance professionally.
There’s natural selection at work, but not on the genetic level … .
You may be right, but the star of the show, Ricky, is acting the part very well. He reminds me of several people I’ve known. I wouldn’t suggest however that he could play a different part.
One reason attractive actors are often cast as “ugly” characters is so they can have the “good heavens, you’re beautiful!” moment. Sometimes all this requires is taking off a pair of glasses and letting one’s hair down. In extreme cases, a workout montage accompanied by “Let’s Get Physical” may be required.
I understand that in at least one version of “Ugly Betty” the protagonist sheds her glasses and braces, changes her hairstyle, and dresses more glamorously as the series progresses. I don’t watch the U.S. version so I don’t know if this transformation is planned or already underway.
Do a search for Karl Malden, Orson Welles, Walter Brennan, Jack Elam, Harry Morgan, Lee Marvin, Juliette Lewis, John Huston, Walter Huston, Angelica Huston and many more who are not the typical movie star images.
I’ve been similarly amazed at how even bad attractive singers are preferable to ugly good ones.
The notable ugly actors notwithstanding, the entertainment industry definitely prefers its stars to be on the beautiful end of the scale. And they are probably just giving the public what the public wants.