They didn’t stop the fake landings- they just pretended to.
Getting back to the original questioning of the CTs proposing that the Moon Landings were faked, how do they account for the reflectors left by several of the Apollo missions?
Is it as simple as they claim that the data from the reflectors is faked, itself?
Yes, I believe it is. I mean, have you seen the reflectors, personally? (BTW, If you say yes, that means you’re in on the whole thing)
The Soviet moon shots were unmanned for the same reason the Mars shots are. First, it’s more believable; they just knew someone somewhere down the line would point out the unmanned nature of the shots as evidence they were not faked. Second, fewer people to have to keep quiet.
And what’s more, they had this documentary on Fox that proved this could not have been enough time for Lee Harvey Oswald to have done the animation, and they got other animators in to try it and none of them could do it inside of 1 hour 41 minutes, so that proves it. Also, even the attempts they did come up with didn’t look anything like real cheese.
Also, ask yourself this, have you ever seen any convincing proof that Oswald, acting alone, would have been able to pull off a moon landing? No. Neither have I. So it must have been a conspiracy. Also, look at the evidence staring you in the face. Look at the letters of ‘Lee Harvey Oswald’ and near the middle you’ll see ‘vey Os’ which is a perfect anagram (almost) of ‘Savoy’ which just happens to be the name of the hotel that Diana was staying in on the night of the so-called ‘accident’. And we are expected to believe that this is just a coincidence?
Do you mean staring me in the face on Mars, or the staring me in the face in the WTC fireball?
Before that, it was loooooooong telegraph wires. That’s how they got their probes back from the moon. YANK!
Oh man oh man, how could you be SO gullible as to believe there is just one face on Mars?
The surface of Mars is covered with faces, glyphs, structures and other sure-fire indicators of intelligent civilisation, including many designs that are subsequently replicated here on Earth as so-called crop circles. These structures on the surface of Mars seldom if ever show up on the official photos (except when, like with the original Face pix, there’s an accidental leak of truth) (cue assorted Dopers: “hey ‘Leak Of Truth’, band name!”… I’ve done it for them so they don’t have to). So obviously NASA are tampering with the photos before they are released, which proves they are ready to tamper with evidence, which proves they cannot be trusted when it comes to the so-called Moon Landings.
Also, for those who still think this is all coincidence, note that ‘moon landings’ = twelve letters precisely, and yet ‘Diana Spencer’ = also twelve letters precisely. Not enough? Well, look at this: moon landings, the letters in the middle just happen to be an anagram of ‘Diana’ (using the’a’ twice)! Crazy, you say? Impossible? Okay, show me one, single piece of well-documented evidence, just one, that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that there is no connection between Jack Ruby and Diana Spencer.
I admit I was distracted by the tiny giant spaceships on the moon.
Funny, the only tiny giant spaceships that I’m aware of intruding into Sol III space (that’s roughly twice the Moon’s orbital radius) accidentially got eaten by a dog.
Dude, this isn’t the Pit. Don’t call Miller a Yank. :rolleyes:
You know, this is actually a pretty good argument. Anyone who has ever been in a serious relationship knows that sometimes maintaining harmony is more important than being right
All the moon hoaxers’ nitpicks are ridiculous. Of course there are no stars in the photos, the exposure time on the camera and the brightness of the moon’s surface made sure of that. And non-parallel shadows? Have these people ever walked outside?
There’s absolutely no way you can look at the footage of the moon landings and conclude they were faked. That’s how good a job we did. The director had more scientific advisers than any other film project. I mean really, if we’re going to fake a moon landing, we’re going to do it right.