A different way to go at this question would be: What might have a much more aggressive Attorney General have done that would have been more effective than Garland has been? A follow-up would be: What might the downsides be for that different A.G., which Garland has sidestepped? (And a third, not really relevant question might be: Who would that different A.G. have been?)
Sure, all those are fine, but the real issue is the question I have asked and received no answer-
Again I ask 'what “protection” could the DoJ do to keep trump from running?
Except that didn’t happen, nor did any of the other nonsense quoted. But it’s a moot point these days.
In case you’re bored …
https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-magiver/937851/168
Enjoy!
Yeah, I’ll disregard all the evidence of attempts to overturn the 2020 election because you say it didn’t happen
Does the phrase “stop the steal” sound familiar? Not only did he have such a campaign he was very loud about it.