Why did the US Mint use silver all those years?

I’m a little bit of a coin collector myself and I’ve often wondered, why were coins made of silver? I can venture a guess as to why they stopped using silver (I’m assuming they finally decided that silver was too precious to be made into coins for circulation), but why was it used in the first place? Was silver not considered to have any value in those days? Was silver plentiful? Was it the easiest to work with in the early days of coin minting? I’m speaking mostly of the life and times of the US Mint, not Celtic rings pounded out 2500 years ago and such.

It just seems like there would have been cheaper alternatives.

We had a lot of it. (We still do.)

There was no fiat money at the time, which meant that all currency needed to be either some precious metal, or a certificate which could be exchanged for precious metal.

Originally money was supposed to actually be worth something. There wasn’t enough gold to go around, so silver was used for smaller units, and copper for very small units. (This is not just in the US, or in “modern times”) After a while there was not enough silver either, nor even enough copper. So, you got promises. The promises could have been written on paper, but people liked to pretend that their money was still actually worth something, and that was easier when it was at least made of metal.

Money is valueless, and was when it was made of gold. You can’t do anything with a gold coin except find someone who believes it is worth something, and give it to him in return for something you want.

Tris

Possible (actually used) coin metals:
aluminum, antimony, copper, gold, iron, nickel, niobium, palladium, platinum, silver, tin, titanium, vanadium, zinc, zirconium.

The actual amounts used were defined in the Coinage Act of 1792.

And rocks :dubious:

Well, what is money, anyway?

First we have barter. But that’s inconvenient, because if you have chickens and want baskets, you have to find someone who wants chickens but has baskets.

So the first step is the concept of the key good. This is a good that portable, durable, divisible, and widely accepted as barter, even by people who don’t neccesarily want the good, because they know they can easily trade it to someone else later for what they really do want.

So there are certain types of goods that make good key goods. Cowrie shells, cattle, whiskey, cigarettes, cacao beans and so forth have all been used as key goods. But precious metals are even more useful key goods. If you have a lump of gold or silver you can make it into jewelry or other ornaments. But so can someone else. And so you can take an ingot of gold from one side of the world to another, and trade it for other goods when you get there.

So metal ingots became a standard key good all over the ancient world. And these metal ingots were the first coins. And governments started creating standardized metal ingots for ease of trade so you didn’t have to weigh each lump.

So silver coins have been used since ancient times as a form of money. Gold coins too, but gold is rarer than silver, and so is valued more highly. So gold coins were judged to be worth more than silver coins. American silver coins were simply a continuation of the ancient practice of using silver as a key good.

Of course, then people realized that you didn’t have to carry around bars of silver or gold. If you deposited your gold at a goldsmith’s shop in his safe, he could give you a reciept for you gold deposit. And if you wanted to buy something, you could hand someone the receipt for your gold or silver deposit, rather than a lump of metal. And if the person trusted you, and trusted the goldsmith, they would accept that reciept as payment, because any time they wished they could go to the goldsmith and get that metal.

And this is the first paper money, a promise by a bank that there exists a certain lump of metal, and if you go to the bank and present the receipt they will hand over the metal. But note that since metal is fungible, the bank doesn’t have to hand back a particular piece of metal…any old lump of silver or gold of a particular purity will do. And they don’t neccesarily have to have a lump of metal for each and every receipt they issue, they just have to have enough reserves to cover their normal business.

And then governments get into this business and issue paper money that can be exchanged for gold or silver. But the governments still have actual gold or silver in reserve, and if you take the paper money to the bank they’ll hand you gold or silver coins that are “real” money. Of course, the coins are only real money in the sense that people will accept them as payment for other goods and services, because gold and silver are “real” goods that have some sort of “real” value. But the value of a gold or silver coin isn’t handed down from on high, the gold or silver is just one more good in a whole marketful of goods, it’s just that the gold and silver are KEY goods. It’s because gold and silver have value that they were made into money.

Then governments get the idea that they don’t actually have to have ANY gold or silver in reserve. Just issue paper money, and declare that the paper money can be used to pay taxes. Governments had previously temporarily suspended payments in precious metals during various crises. During a war the government wouldn’t give you gold for your paper money, you had to accept greenbacks based on nothing more than the promise of the government that the paper money would be worth something.

And today’s fiat money is nothing more than a promise by various governments that money has a certain value. This is regarded with horror by people who think “real” money is backed by precious metals. But if the government can pass a law tomorrow and refuse to exchange your gold standard dollars for actual gold, what’s the difference between that and a paper dollar that never had any such promise?

Silver is one of the first metals used in coinage. Yes, they also used bronze, but although bronze is cheaper, coins then were often valued by the worth of the metal. The English Penny was like the size of the old US Silver dollar, a huge thing, and hard to carry your days shopping worth around with. The same amount of silver was the size of a dime (this varies, of course). In fact, for over a thousand years a silver coin around the size of a dime was the money.

FYI, the standard “gold piece” was not the huge $20 (again, around the size of the silver dollar) but the 1/4oz coin around the size of a nickel. worth $5. The “gold soveriegn” was that size, and in the old US days if one referred casually to “a gold coin”, that was the size one was referring to.

Those are just metals that are the predominant metal in at least one kind of coin. More metals than those are used in coinage. For instance, the US 1 dollar has some manganese in it and chrome steel was used for low denomination French coins in the 60s.

Metals Used in Coins and Medals

As others have noted, silver (and gold) were used precisely because they were valuable.

I’ve always wondered about that. Some old currency bears the marking “This note is a Legal Tender at its face value for all debts public and private except duties on imports and interest on the public debt”. That seems to say that it’s good enough for the proles, but if you owe money to the government, they want real money.

The public debt is owed by the government, not to the government.

Outstanding post, Lemur.

The medium of exchange used to be the base of exchange as well (that’s what they told me in 4th grade, anyway).

I’m aware of that, but why isn’t it good enough for paying duties, which used to be the major revenue source of the federal government?

Because they wanted to build up and maintain a gold reserve, at a time when paper money could still be exchanged for gold. Importers usually paid for imports in gold in those days, so they had a ready supply.

Gee, they told you that in fourth grade? You had a good education!

Actually, that’s about as concise an answer to the OP as there is!

I initially misread that as acrimony.

I would like to have a coin made with acrimony. I picture a bust of Andrew Jackson, with a legend that says “Here’s your goddamn money!”

How about coins made out of mercury? Then we could carry our money around in a jar and pour out whatever we need.

In the U.S., at least, simple tradition was the reason. Coins were “supposed” to be made of some valuable material, and at one time I believe the U.S. government tried to maintain a steady exchange rate between gold and silver, at a rate of very roughly twenty to one. A silver dollar contains almost an ounce of silver, and a $20 gold piece contains just a hair under one ounce of gold. But the value of silver fell sharply and to this day is not worth nearly 1/20 of its weight in gold.

What this meant in terms of our coinage was that in the post-WW2 era when silver was still being used to manufacture coins, the actual silver content was worth far less than the face value of the coin. A dime contained less than four cents worth of silver in 1960. So in a way that was fiat money too.

I was thinking Lyndon Johnson and an f-bomb, myself. :slight_smile: