Why do I need to endorse my cheques?

A friend of mine recently asked me what the “proper” way to endorse a cheque is; apparently he had been writing varying amounts of information, ranging from nothing (not even his signature) to his full address, account number, etc. on the back of his cheques, without any problems.

This got me to thinking: what is the purpose of my signing the back of my cheques? I’ve always signed the backs of my cheques and written “For Deposit Only” & my account number, but I’ve never really thought about why I do it. Certainly it’s advantageous for the payee that I sign them, since it proves that I actually received the cheque; but I’m not exactly sure what advantage there is to me to doing so. I’m also aware that there’s some corpus of law about how cheques should be written by payees, treated by banks, etc., which probably says something about this subject.

So my questions are two-fold: first, what do I need to do to a cheque (payable to me) such that I’ll be sure to get the money, and what can the bank require of me under the law? Second, what are the possible Bad Things that could happen to me and my money should I neglect to properly endorse my cheques?

Typical scenario I encountered when processing mail-in deposits:

Customer mails in deposit ticket and checks.
Customer forgot to endorse checks.
We process deposit as usual for our forgetful customer, but stamp “Prior Endorsement Guaranteed” and our ABA number on the check and write your account number where endorsement usually goes.
Check works its way to the writer’s bank and all is well.

The most likely Bad Thing that would happen is the un-endorsed check gets separated from the deposit ticket or any other intelligence identifying its intended destination and doesn’t get deposited to your account. Wayward checks like this are kept for a while (recall it’s 30 days) with the hopes that someone will call up and ask what happened to their deposit.

Endorsing with For Deposit Only and your account number is all you need - a signature isn’t required. When we received checks that were simply signed, we had to write the account number on the check.

Cute side note - the act of signing a check to cash it used to be called indorsing a check. When the use of what we now call “prior endorsement guaranteed” became legal and/or popular, it was fairly quickly realized that indorsement needed to be changed to endorsement as the shorthand was PIG and customers got unhappy when checks came back with PIG written or stamped on them. Customers don’t seem to have any problem with PEG. :slight_smile:

A check (cheque north of the St. Lawrence or east of the Atlantic) is a negotiable order to someone holding money in your behalf (i.e., your bank) to pay a sum of money you specify to the order of someone else (i.e., whoever you write in the appropriate blank). When you accept a check from someone, you are now the legitimate holder of that order to pay. As such, it behooves you, unless you did emergency plumbing for B.D. Cooper and now hold the only legitimate signature of his newer than 1975 or so, to turn that into money by negotiating it yourself. You do so by presenting it to someone else with your order to pay it to that someone else. If you are depositing it in your bank, or signing it over to your landlord for the rent, your signature as an endorsement is sufficient to turn it into a “bearer check” – i.e., the bank used by Smith, who paid you, now is liable to pay out money from Smith’s account to whoever presents that check for payment. Your bank is happy to do so, crediting your account for the amount and negotiating the check with Smith’s bank, along with a few hundred other checks. (In point of fact, they probably won’t do it themselves, but rather go through a clearinghouse where $1,784,320 in checks drawn on First National deposited by Union Bank and Loan and $1,782,105 in checks drawn on Union Bank and Loan deposited by First National cancel out to leave a net $2,215 transfer between the banks.)

Like this: John Corrado is holding $10,000 in my money (I wish! :)). I decide to buy a pearl-handled Edwardian cigarette holder from Eve’s collection, which she’s willing to sell me for $100. I write a letter to John telling him to give Eve $100. However, Eve won’t see John for some months, but it happens that she will be lunching with Ukulele Ike just before he happens to travel down to John’s bailiwick. So she signs my letter to pay over to Uke, who gives her $100 for it, takes it south with him, and presents it to John. John reads it, sees that I instructed him to give Eve money, that she in turn instructed him to give Uke that money, and pays the $100 to Uke. Substitute in two banks for John and Uke, and you have the transfer.

Now, suppose I have a check for $100 from Cecil Adams. Knowing the collector’s value of it, I contribute it to a Doper’s auction for tsunami relief. Gaudere decides to volunteer to coordinate the auction. So I mail it to her. I could endorse it over to her, using her real name, and having her endorse it on to the high bidder. But instead, I simply endorse it with my signature. Now whoever has physical possession of the check legally is able to negotiate it, and neither she nor I has to worry about ensuring it’s signed over to the proper RL name of whoever wins the auction. It’s become a “bearer document.” That’s why you need not endorse it to such-and-such bank, who endorses it to some other bank, who endorses it to a clearing house, who in turn endorses it to another clearing house, which in turn endorses it to the bank on which it was drawn – non-restrictive endorsements with care to its physical location ensure that it’s negotiable by whichever banks happen to end up handling it.

Just to emphasize a point in **Polycarp’s ** excellent post, if you wish to prevent a check from being bearer paper, endorse it: “[Payable] to the order of Jane Roe.” This would be a good thing to do if you are sending it through the mail. When you endorse a check “For deposit only” and present it to your bank, the bank can only deposit it. It cannot give you any cash since you limited the endorsement. If you want some money from the check, just endorse it blank with your name (or “to the order of XYZ Bank” but this is unnecessary if you give it to the bank personally).

Isn’t it D.B. Cooper? :slight_smile:

Actually, neither. It’s “Dan Cooper.” From this site (and many others):

(emhasis mine)

Thanks for all your replies, everyone. Just to check if I’m reading the above correctly: Suppose Polycarp gives me a cheque drawn on the First National Bank of Door into Summer. I could, if I chose, go to the nearest branch of FNBDoS and, after satisfying them that I’m the person named on the cheque, receive the money directly from them, without any need to deal with my own bank. Is this correct?

Yes, Poly would be the drawer of a check payable on demand to you, the holder of the check and payee, from the drawer bank. In order for you to cash the check, though, the bank is entitled to your indorsement, which is basically your contract that you are now liable on that instrument.

We can all be thankful that cheques do not go by the slang term, “cracker.”

Oh, no. Here it comes.

Otherwise, sending a cheque to Polycarp might turn out to be, “Poly wanna cracker?”

It’s a full moon night. It happens.