“You said you didn’t know what the God of the Gaps argument was, which tells me you have a very long road ahead of you to understand what it is that you are arguing here.”
I don’t understand what I am arguing because I didn’t read the Gods of the Gaps argument someone posted?
“and that you are thinking you are trailblazing on some very well trod road here.”
Trailblazing? I don’t think I’ve yet to say something that hasn’t been said before. Did I claim to?
“But then you gave a perfect definition of God of the Gaps, where what we don’t know and cannot currently explain is given over to the realm of the divine.”
I simply stated the only reason I know to answer Why do so many people still believe in God? Seems others are saying the same reason.
“The ignorance is that we don’t know everything about the universe.”
Right. And why does that mean we can then know something that is unknowable? Why does “we don’t know everything” mean “everything is possible”? It doesn’t to me. That doesn’t seem logical.
Can you tell me what flavor the number five has?
I say numbers don’t have flavors.
You seem to be saying we don’t know because we don’t know everything that is knowable.
Is that right?
“The reason is because there is no other explanation for the origin of the universe and life.”
Yes… for those that believe in god … as per the topic question.
“It’s the ONLY one at present outside of ‘the universe always existed…it was never created”
Right. (Quoting myself.)
“Either you are saying that the explanation for the origin of the universe and life is god, or you are just randomly stringing words together in a way that is mostly grammatically correct.”
There’s no god and the universe always existed.
“The only ones who would argue with that are theists that claim that atheism is a belief.”
Sounds fair.
“I don’t know that I would go that far. Theists make claims that god controls the weather, that god sends plagues and storms and other nasty things against sinners.”
I stated atheists … I was talking about atheists who are angry… they’re not really atheists, they’re more accurately anti-theists.
“No, and only angry theists claim that they do. How can I hate something that doesn’t exist?”
Exactly. So the angry atheists are not atheists … as I said.
“People can be inspired to do good by religion, but how do you know that they wouldn’t have been fantastic people without religion?”
I don’t get the logic. I said religion is good if it makes people more moral. How does that mean people can only be moral by means of religion?
“As for why atheists may be angry, it’s not that they are angry at god or the concept of god, they are angry at other people who try to control their lives by invoking their religion as justification.”
Atheists aren’t angry. Still the same point … they’re actually not atheists if they’re angry.
“No, the universe isn’t eternal either.”
It is. The universe means everything. A ‘framework that caused the universe’ must also be a part of the universe … the framework statement doesn’t make sense … there’s no nature to reality because the nature of everything would also be part of everything.
Just because we don’t know everything doesn’t mean that anything is possible. That’s not sensible.
There are infinite questions that have no answer. There’s no reason that all questions must have answers.
“How many meters long is my anxiety?”
“When did turnips stop being lazy?”
“How did the universe begin?”
These seem equally absurd.