Why do they say fixed gear bikes don't have breaks?

NEW ?
or retro ??

There’s a few features that got added to the bicycle over time.

  1. the ability to coast without the pedals moving
    then
  2. The back pedalling brake mechanism
    and
  3. multiple gears - De Railler invented the mechanism to move the chain from one gear to another. This isn’t compatible with back pedalling brakes, because De Railler’s invention includes auto-tensioning, and back pedalling would apply force to the tensioner rather than the brake mechanism.

But

They got invented and added , the fixie was first.

I’m not sure if I’m being whooshed by a joke here, but the term derailleur gears is from a French word, and refers to the fact that the chained is dislodged (“derailed”) from one sprocket to another.

Because it’s easy to bust a bike lock, but try carrying away or single-wheeling a stolen bike. Maybe this isn’t done any more, but it seemed like SOP (20 years ago in Manhattan) that the messengers would lock the rear wheel and frame together to a light pole or whatever, pop the quick release on the front wheel, and carry that with them inside as they made the delivery.

There’s a simpler solution; always apply the back brake first.

Depending on where you live, a bike with no front brake may not be street-legal.

Speaking for myself, I found that thread VERY confusing.

This thread does a vastly better job of explaining the difference between fixed and single-speed.

No, this is not a good plan.

A rear brake is ineffective if you want to stop quickly - as you add brake pressure, the back wheel will lock up and skid.

A front brake is much more effective. To minimize the risk of it “grabbing”, make sure that your wheel is true, and that there are no major dents to the braking surface of the rim. Then, it’s a question of applying braking force progressively, and acquiring the skill to maintain control while doing so.

Quotes an article in the OP about how UK law requires brakes on both wheels, yet disregards this well meaning regulation because someone said something.

The rear wheel of the bicycle has more of your weight on it. If you acquire the skill to not lock up and skid, it will give you more friction than the front, with significantly less risk of losing control.

From the OP’s quote. The freewheel mechanism is what lets the rear wheel spin without pulling the chain round.

No, under braking, the weight shifts to the front wheel (this is true of any vehicle), so the front brake will stop the bike much more quickly. Maintaining control is a more complex question, described in detail below. But the bottom line is that expert cyclists use the rear brake far less than the front brake.

This is a good account of braking technique for a road bike:

[My bolding, and my comment added in square brackets]

The rear brake alone will also work fine when you’re stopping only very gradually. And I think it can also be preferred when braking on a downhill, though I’ve never run the numbers on that.

20 years ago is a couple years before my time so maybe that’s why I’ve never seen it. But a couple things make me doubt that this practice would have ever been common. First of all, messengers use bolt on hubs more frequently than quick release. In fact track hubs, which are frequently used front and rear, are always bolt on. Second, even if a quick release is used, a hose clamp would be used to limit theft risk. If not a hose clamp, they would go with a locking skewer - which is more expensive, but very theft proof. Lastly, messengers tend to be very concerned with time, so I think most messengers would choose any other option than taking off the front wheel for every delivery.

On a long fast descent, a racing cyclist will try to judiciously use the rear brake as much as possible, but this is to avoid overheating the front brake. But careful control is required under firmer braking at high speed approaching a downhill bend. Great care is required that not too much rear brake is applied if you’re under significant braking as the turn begins, because it’s easy to lock up the rear wheel and have it slide out sideways. It’s similar to the “fishtailing” issue described in the article above.

I acknowledge that this is true for maximum braking and that removing the front brake out of fear of tumbling over the handlebars is a dumb thing. I still think “use your front brake” is not good advice for casual cyclists.

I disagree totally. The front brake is the one that slows you down and stops you. The rear brake can be used in certain circumstances to provide extra control, but the front is where your stopping power is. Even on a mountain bike on loose gravel, it’s the front that has the grip and stops you. The back brake has minimal stopping power compared to the front. This goes for any level of cyclist.

As explained above, this is very wrong advice, for any level of cyclist. To re-quote from the article above:

It is important for all cyclists for their own safety and the safety of other road users to develop their skills in modulating front brake pressure and in handling the bike safely under rapid braking.

Including motorcyclists:

I remember watching a chase movie involving NYC delivery cyclists, and the hero begins running away from the villain by cycling backwards at a pretty good clip - something you can only do when the pedals are effectively locked to the wheel with fixed gearing. (and with practice)

There’s no reason why a bike like that could not have caliper brakes like a 10-speed, except maybe testosterone.

Just this week we had the verdict in the case of a young London cyclist riding an unmodified track fixie (without a front brake) who killed a pedestrian. It was the first ever prosecution of a cyclist for manslaughter, although he was only convicted of a lesser charge. Expert testimony was presented that he could probably have stopped safely with a front brake.

Agree 100%. I bike a lot (ride motorcycles too but not enough time for that sport), and cannot imagine not using the front brake. Every stop is a combination of both brakes with the front being more important. There are times when the rear is used on its own, mainly for simple slowing. With faster stops or downhill stops, positioning your body is also important (move your butt back). My mountain bike and cross bike both have extremely strong brakes that could certainly throw you over the handlebars but they are also easy to gradually apply pressure as long as you don’t panic.

New bike riders: Learn to use both brakes in combination. Practice emergency braking. Learn what the limits are.:slight_smile: