Packing factor. Rectangular boxes can be pressed up against each other with no appreciable gaps between the edges. No wasted space. Round cylinders have dead space in the interstices between the round bits.
Here is the 3-D version using spheres. 2-D has similar packing factor.
Imagine a square grid of circles, aligned in columns and rows. If all the circles are in straight columns and rows, you get lots of gap between the curves.
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
Now look at the “honeycomb” pattern, where the second row is offset by half a diameter, so it fits into the gap between the two above it in the first row. (I can’t indent a half-space, but I think this suggests the idea.)
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
Tighter packing factor, still some dead space.
Here is a discussion of circle packing. Scroll down to the pretty pictures. See the one labeled “Square”? That is the first example above. Look at the yellow compared to black. Now look at the one labeled “Triangular”. Notice how there is less yellow, less wasted space. That is the physical demonstration of packing factor, i.e. measure of wasted space.
Rectangles of consistent size are much more efficient than round things.