Why does this board lean Democrat?

[DSeid]

@Bricker

Am I wrong in this? Honestly?

To my read, and again without having read the thread, yes.

Asking for a cite is not JAQing.

In this case I have no idea if the gunpowder used in fireworks comes from the same manufacturing supplies as the gunpowder in bullets or not. I do not know what the NRA actually blocked. A law that proposed taggants in all gunpowder or a law that proposed taggants in gunpowder that went into bullets only? I am not so sure why I should care about the distinction and do not. Looking briefly I do find this claim:

The gunpowder used in fireworks – a secondary use of the product – would still have had to contain taggants placed there by the gunpowder manufacturer.

Is that true? I don’t really care and I have no desire to hijack this thread into that one. But debating which is true and asking for a more definitive cite for a claim to the contrary seems very within bounds and is NOT claiming the contrary. If you had provided solid proof that the NRA had never done anything that would have blocked taggants in the gunpowder that goes into fireworks and he ignored your proof and subsequently claimed they had, then he would have been guilty of what you have claimed he did. You provide no evidence that such happened. Maybe it did, but nothing you have brought here shows that.

Just my read.

[Ibn_Warraq]

@Lobohan

Doesn’t it seem a little heavy handed to insinuate that 'luci is equivalent to anti-Semite conspiracy theorists?

Never mind that at least some fireworks uses the same formulation of black powder that firearms do, so Bricker is off base.

Is this a whoosh?

I’m a bit tired so I can’t tell.

I thought it was obvious that my post was a sarcastic response to Bricker’s comparison between elucid and people who are JAQing off.

[elucidator]

Well, I sure as hell missed it, and was wondering what the hell I had done to you to deserve such a grave insult. But if that isn’t what you intended, no harm done.

[Lobohan]

@Ibn_Warraq

Is this a whoosh?

I’m a bit tired so I can’t tell.

I thought it was obvious that my post was a sarcastic response to Bricker’s comparison between elucid and people who are JAQing off.

My apologies. I did think it was way out of character.

[Ibn_Warraq]

No problem. If two people thought it was for real who are somewhat familiar with my posting style, then I wasn’t clear enough.

[elucidator]

You have a “style”? Where can I get one?

[eschereal]

@elucidator

You have a “style”? Where can I get one?

You go to a Stylist, but really, I would be careful practicing Stylism in public.