Bad quality image can be found here, but you can see that this tuna has 0g of protein. It also has 60 calories, but I’m not sure where these calories come from if there is no protein or carbs and almost no fat.
Can someone shed some light on this?
It also has 2 g of fiber. I’ll vote for the nutritional info being a total ass-pull.
Is it possible that it’s 10 g protein and the 1 is blurred into the 0?
Here’s an image from Amazon: Amazon.com : Chicken of the Sea Chunk Light Tuna in Water, Wild Caught Tuna, 5-Ounce Can (Pack of 48) : Cooking And Baking Gelatin Mixes : Grocery & Gourmet Food
For 50 cal it shows 11 g protein. Pretty close to the 60 cal on your image.
The “sugars” listed right above is 0g and looks just the same.
Could be. If I squint juuuuuust right, I think I can see a 1.
Click on the picture. It enlarges.
How can you have 0g of carbohydrates yet 2g of dietary fiber? Fiber is a subset of carbohydrates. Something is off about that label.
I think it must say 13 g of protein, which would yield about 52 calories.
Near the bottom of the image find “PRODUCT OF THAILAND.”
That’s the tipoff. We’re not big on proofreading here in the Land of Smiles.
No, there’s this new, ‘health-conscious’ tuna out there. It’s protein-free! So know those concerned about those evil calories can go ahead and start making their favorite tuna salad sandwiches again! With fat-free mayo, of course. And bread make from tapioca starch. Yum!
It clearly says 0g on the package. I tried but could not take a better quality image.
I just did a very incomplete search, but the barcode does not appear to be valid.
Does that say “Low in mercury” in scare quotes?
Occam’s razor: it’s just a typo (as septimus implied).
Servings per can 2, USDA policy is that if the nutrients are under a particular size, you can claim they are 0.
Frex, all those cute little packets of 0 cal splenda? The bulking agent is a form if sugar that DOES have calories, just that in 1 gram portions they are able to get away by claiming 0 calories. So people feel free to dump 10 into a drink and claim they are adding no calories. Wrong. And fiber is another sneaky one, you can deduct the carbs of dietary soluable fibers from calories of carbs to get the adjusted carbs.
Isn’t nutrition labeling funsigh
… at least this thread introduced me to “total ass-pull” !!!
But if it’s less than a half-assed pull, you can claim it’s assless.
This is not true.
IvoryTowerDenizen is correct. Its either a typo or just a bad image.
Who would have thought that a can of tuna CONTAINS FISH.
It’s not tuna, it’s “light” tuna.