Why don't people believe in God?

How can you claim that my experiences are less valid, less true, than yours?

There are plenty of “baptised” folks - who according to you - all get the “Holy Spirit” at baptisim that disagree on very simple ‘bible truths’- who are you to say which one of those is true, which one is ‘false’ ?

With as much disagreement over what ‘the bible means’ - that alone should be enough to prove that it can’t come from a ‘truth loving god’.

How much false hood must a work contain before the whole is declared unfit? a little? 5%? 50%?

Do you believe in the literal, global flood of Noah?

How old is the earth?

Timo, if you want to reach people and minister to their souls, hope they convert and further spread a gospel that you believe in, the way to do that is by living an exemplary and helpful life. Look at all this time you’ve spent on here. Look at all the time you’ve apparently spent memorizing scripture. And you’ve also apparently spent a great deal of time in church.

Now, if you were to reach me and get me to change to your viewpoint, none of those things would do it. No, what it would take would you being a humble servant. Someone who puts others needs above your own. Someone whose whole life is about helping, in such a way that it highlights the best of your God. If you spent all that time that I outlined above working at a soup kitchen, building homes for the poor and reading to the elderly, I’d be more apt to believe there was something more worthwhile going on than simply a fear of hell.

Anyway, I’m hoping you’re young enough to learn. I also appreciate you responding to me about being gleeful. It’s good of you to admit a mistake. A lot more contemplation in general may be in order and less frustration might not rule your days.

Good if nothing else we have helped you on the path of discovery, we are pleased.

But please remember to read up on confirmation bias, it would be easy to see lots of parallels in other religions that you may say strengthen your faith but in reality what it could do (if you are open) is raise some very philosophical questions about religion.

Again thanks for the witnessing and good luck on your path, FYI we do throw the best parties.

  1. Technically, it is spelled “Sodom”.
  2. There is practically no evidence such a city ever existed.
  3. Some Biblical scholars believe that the sins that got the city destroyed were inhospitality and greed, and we’ve got plenty of that to go around.

Judging from this post and some of your previous posts, it might behoove you to actually read the book instead of waving it around like a weapon. Why should any of us listen to you if you seem ignorant about your own religion?

What you’re demonstrating here though it that you have stopped searching for the truth, because you place a higher value on certainty.

You would rather be certain and be 100% wrong than 75% right, with assorted doubts.

And you’ll never know if you’re wrong, because you have decided to stop checking if you are wrong. You have decided that its more important to doggedly insist that you are right, instead. And if you’ll never know if you’re wrong, that means you’ll also never know if you’re right.

No. You’re only matching the order twice.

While you’re away studying other religions, try to spend a little time considering the possibility that some people don’t have a need for god or faith. And that these people live happy lives filled with kindness, love, friends and families. You may find safety in numbers with fellow brother and sister believers; But consider the fact that you use god, faith and bible as a shield against some unspecified enemy trying to corrupt your virtues and keep you from getting into heaven. Is life in fear of punishment but a god that you love the sort of life you want to live?

Spend some time trying to imagine a world where YOU are wrong, and this life is all that there is. How would that change the way you live your life today? I mean aside from freeing up your Sundays… :wink:

Your example simply boiled down to “God only sets the pieces up. How you react differentiates tests and tempts”. If I don’t lust, God was merely testing me. If I lust, I was tempted on my own accord and God was still only testing me.

Either way, you’re saying God sent that girl. Well I’m sure God is sending lots of girls. And guys. And manipulates events so that people become fermentors and vendors of alcohol. Growers, manufacturers, and vendors of drugs. Unscrupulous, greedy usurers of money. And so on. An intricate system of tests upon tests so that we all play pawns in a tangled web of testing just so God knows how we act in accordance to these tests.

You’re saying God is constantly prodding and cajoling actions to create environments that we each perceive and react to, and is noting our reaction. Our reactions dictates if we are tempted or not but God is merely testing.

Well I find this objectionable. In order for me to be tempted by drugs, someone else’s life HAS to be tempted in such a way that he offers me drugs. By definition. His life was molded solely for this one test. If I’m tested again by drugs, there goes another life that HAS to be ruined in order for my salvation. Every time someone confronts me with sin, it is a life that God by necessity ruined (possibly for all eternity) in order for me to be tested. Not only do I find that objectionable, I find it deplorable, but luckily ultimately, implausible.

If your read Matthew you will see that Jesus said the end would come in that generation. Many churches teach the word generation didn’t mean the same then, but Matthew also wrote that there was 14 generations between David and Jesus, just the same as it is used now.

Surely you realize this is just the words and ideas of another human?

Take note of the psalmist who writes" I said you are gods, and son’s of the most high. Jesus backs this up in John 10.

I nearly fell into that trap too, just didn’t think anything was going on that far back. Weren’t you on Jeopardy too? Seems like I read a thread of all of the Jeopardy contestants that are from the Straight Dope board, and was really impressed how many we had, and thought I remember you being one of them. Lot of interesting smart people here. I’m not worthy, but appreciate you guys putting up with me, nevertheless. :slight_smile:

I don’t know what they are teaching you in Sunday school. You stated God doesn’t tempt. I showed where there are instances where God is doing the tempting in the bible, but you put it back on us again. Is there any act or crime that this biblical God could commit that you would finally say, this is so ridiculously insane that it is comical, or will he get a free pass each and every time when it appears we are playing with a stacked deck?

When Jesus went into the wilderness to fast for 40 days and nights, the devil gave him three main temptations, but not a single one of them had anything to do with sexual desire. For lust of the flesh, the devil tempted him with stones that he wanted Jesus to turn into loaves of bread. There there was lust of the eyes, where he showed him material wealth, and the other was pride. Since the bible is often preoccupied with our bedtime habits elsewhere, I thought it was a little strange it didn’t come up here.

Elsewhere Jesus does talk about how if a man looks at a woman with lust he already has committed adultery in his heart. He goes on to say, if a body part causes you to sin, to tear it out. In Matthew 5:28-30, some people took those scriptures literally to do just that, and some resorted to self-castration including Origen, one of the earlier church fathers.

Maybe Epicurus can explain it better than me:

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?”

Here’s how Einstein explained it:

“Nobody, certainly, will deny that the idea of the existence of an omnipotent, just, and omnibeneficent personal God is able to accord man solace, help, and guidance; also, by virtue of its simplicity it is accessible to the most undeveloped mind. But, on the other hand, there are decisive weaknesses attached to this idea in itself, which have been painfully felt since the beginning of history. That is, if this being is omnipotent, then every occurrence, including every human action, every human thought, and every human feeling and aspiration is also His work; how it is possible to think of holding men responsible for their deeds and thoughts before such an almighty Being? In giving out punishment and rewards He would to a certain extent be passing judgment on Himself. How can this be combined with the goodness and righteousness ascribed to Him?”

How would a believer respond to Einstein’s last question? Is it something along these lines: “I don’t pretend to understand it all, I just follow what he tells me, the best I can make out whatever it is he is saying. I know that Jesus loves me and died for me, you, and every single one of us are miserable ingrates and unworthy sinners that are not deserving, but he still loves us and lets us live. He didn’t have to do this for us, but he did. I don’t have to understand it; I just have to believe it, and that’s good enough for me.”

Timo, there is a lot to wade through here, did you give your account of a personal experience, or just tell us you had one? If you have, I’d appreciate you pointing out which post it was.

I’m not a christian, but I doubt I could enjoy heaven knowing that there were people burning for eternity, for the simple sin of not believing in a god that chooses not to introduce itself. I don’t think I’d have the last laugh.

A god with the power to torture someone for eternity, who exercises that power, does not deserve praise.

Post #79

Thanks DB. I read that, but thought it might be more. I thought it might be more like a personal revelation that many people say they have which often occur during the night while sleeping or right before falling asleep. Some have lucid dreams. Others have the NDE and OBE, and won’t shut up about it, while still others play it safe and say it is too personal to talk about.

Yeah, I’m going to have to investigate on the Bible, but the question I was answering was of a post that said that he knew a lot of so called Christians that were bad people. Or so called people that followed God.

Those verses were to tell him that those people that claim to follow God yet commit actions that even unbelievers know is atrocious, will deserve their punishment. Regardless whether you believe the Bible is true or not, if you do,then you know this will happen, If you don’t, then it’s quite sad knowing that people are leading others astray because of this so called religion. However, it’s just maybe comforting to know, that they are deceivers and will be given consequences when their time comes and not glory that they might expect.

Which version of the Bible do you follow?

Who’s fault is it if they are following ‘their understanding’ of the bible after having been baptized and receiving the ‘holy spirit’ ? You said all a person needs to do is ‘show a little faith and get baptized to receive all these deep insights into the holy book’ - who are you to question the holy spirit in these other people?

And you dared to call me clueless -