After following the Evolution Vs Creation debate for a few years now I have come to the conclusion that evolution is not possible.
After doing a lot of research on the topic and looking at different points of view I have decided to present a set of hypotheses that prove that evolution is not possible. The hypotheses are not my own, but I believe that I could not have refined them any better.
[extremely long post deleted. you not only quoted from the aformentioned website, you copied the entire website, which is not only probably illegal, but also tactless and unimaginative.-Czarcasm]
Well there it is, I am not christian myself but I do believe in natural design and order.
All right, since this is taken verbatim from another site, I think it’s going to be deleted pretty soon. Therefore, I’m not going to respond to each point. I will suggest, however, that you brush up on big bang cosmology, thermodynamics, evolution, and information theory.
To wit:[ul][li] Evolution is not “the idea that natural, undirected processes are sufficient to account for the existence of all natural things.” That’s a straw man, and that won’t get you far here.[/li][li] The big bang wasn’t an explosion. It was the beginning of spacetime. As it was not an explosion, it needn’t be at all similar to regular explosions.[/li][li] Open systems needn’t tend do disorder if enough energy is applied. Examples include planets, galaxies, and lifeforms.[/li] I would like to see where information theory states that “information never arises out of randomness or chance events”. Information theory doesn’t even really apply here, as it merely deals with the optimal way to transmit signals in the presence of noise.[/ul]I suggest you read up at talkorigins.org.
This has been done. Repeatedly. Ad nauseum. I’m sure other people will be along to point out the mistakes in those people’s arguments. I just have one question. What is your theory regarding the diversity of life?
In fact, I’m pretty darned sure this entire post, word for word, has been posted here before and ripped to shreds. Hiyruu, why don’t you go and actually do the research you claim to have done in your OP, then come back, OK?
Well, but built in how? What’s the mechanism? Also, why do different species exist? How come there’s a dog, a bug, and me? Why are we different from each other. If evolution doesn’t happen, then the dog’s ancestors always were dogs, the bugs ancestors always were bugs, and my ancestors always were people. Is that what you’re arguing? If so, what evidence do you have that that’s true?
Four weeks ago, this list was posted verbatim by Raven255.
It was then torn to itty, bitty, teeny shreds.
Perhaps, Hiryuu, you could indulge us by carefully scanning that thread before continuing to post in this one. That would give you a head start on the arguments against your position, which would otherwise be repeated like a call-and-return session at the 1st Baptist.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ultrafilter *
**All right, since this is taken verbatim from another site, I think it’s going to be deleted pretty soon. Therefore, I’m not going to respond to each point. I will suggest, however, that you brush up on big bang cosmology, thermodynamics, evolution, and information theory.
To wit:[ul][li] Evolution is not “the idea that natural, undirected processes are sufficient to account for the existence of all natural things.” That’s a straw man, and that won’t get you far here.[/li][li] The big bang wasn’t an explosion. It was the beginning of spacetime. As it was not an explosion, it needn’t be at all similar to regular explosions.[/li][li] Open systems needn’t tend do disorder if enough energy is applied. Examples include planets, galaxies, and lifeforms.[/li][li] I would like to see where information theory states that “information never arises out of randomness or chance events”. Information theory doesn’t even really apply here, as it merely deals with the optimal way to transmit signals in the presence of noise.[/ul]I suggest you read up at talkorigins.org. **[/li][/QUOTE]
Why shoud you care if it was taken from a website? These are universal hypotheses and putting it in my own words would be time-consuming and unnecessary.
I don’t care, but the mods don’t particularly like it, especially if it’s long and/or possibly copyrighted. If you have anything to say about the rest of the post, I’d like to hear that.