Why exactly is spilling oil bad for the environment?

So I was thinking about oil spills we’ve had over the past few decades as well as the advice given about not dumping used motor oil.

Why, exactly, is spilling oil bad? If oil came from the ground to begin with, why does putting it back pose a problem? If I change my car’s oil and dump the old oil on the ground, isn’t that reinvesting in my country’s oil reserves in the sense that the oil can mix with the other oil that people have dumped and become viable as a new oil drilling project in a few decades as more and more people dump oil in my neighborhood?

One idea I had is that only refined or used oil poses an environmental problem as it has been altered to such an extent as to become toxic and that spilling all-natural crude oil is fine, but then I thought of the Deepwater Horizon and how it was basically spilling crude oil that had just been found.

Because oil isn’t naturally found in the surface environment (in significant quantities) – it’s all buried deep underground.

If you spilled oil by pumping it into a deep underground chamber and sealing it, there wouldn’t be much of a problem. But when you distribute it on the surface, surface life isn’t adapted to it.

Almost anything can be hazardous in the wrong place.

Well, for one, it’s not being put back into the ground. It’s being put onto beaches and into the water. Things that live on the beaches and in the water don’t like being covered in oil.

I’m not really understanding your question, I don’t think. Are you asking why naturally occurring things (oil) kill other things (wildlife)? Are you asking why we make a value judgement on what’s good and bad? Why is jumping into a pool of lava bad? I mean it’s natural!

Or instead you can bring your used motor oil to an official collection point so that it can be re-refined and reused as motor oil immediately instead of somehow eventually mixing with oil that other people have dumped in their backyards but in the meantime is contaminating groundwater.

on the surface organisms have evolved to live with water, both internally and externally, and oil interferes with that life.

putting oil onto or into the ground has the oil be in or pass through where groundwater is, we drink that and need it to live; it pollutes the groundwater and makes it unfit for use.

Crude oil can be lots of different stuff. From light sweet crude, which can be almost good enough to run an engine with, to quite nasty sour crudes, with lots of sulphur containg compounds that are quite noxious. Indeed some wells contain very dangerous levels of hydrogen sulphide. So leaking crude can involve significant levels of quite nasty stuff, other than the simple oil itself.

Refined oil is mostly pretty benign. We treat out car engines very well, and we work hard to get the nasty stuff out of the fuel and lubricants we put into engines. We certainly like to remove the sulphur. Modern lubricants have all sorts of additives, so they are not just oil. Used engine oil can pick up all sorts of junk and combustion products, and is likely to be quite nasty.

Crude oil is usually a lot of different compounds. The chemistry that created the oil from the basic material really doesn’t care much what it makes, so in addition to the alkanes that you want, you get a lot of long chain, and cyclic hydrocarbons. Cyclic hydrocarbons can be toxic of themselves. Think benzene, and other aromatics. The long chain hydrocarbons have very low melting points, and are the usual constituents of tar and waxes. So when the shorter chain stuff evaporates or is consumed you are left with balls of tar to deal with. Refining crude gets us all sorts of interesting chemicals as residue left after we have got the good stuff (short alkanes mostly) used to feed our cars. It has been observed that we are lucky we have such an appetite for plastics since we would have a serious disposal problem for refining residues otherwise. Plus waxes, tar, creosote, etc are all useful.

Oil in the water takes some time to be eliminated. Whilst it is there it can damage wildlife, simple stuff like oily coatings killing birds, coating plants leaves and killing the plants, and so on. In the water the lighter oil fractions are eventually eaten by bacteria that specialise in oil. However in order to consume the oil, the bacteria need quite a bit of oxygen, so you can get large areas of oxygen depleted water, which kills all the fish in it.

Oil leaks from the ground naturally in many places in the world - indeed the Gulf of Mexico is full of such leaks. Some of the tarballs that were found on the beaches during the Deepwater Horizon disaster were not from the leak, but were from natural seeps. The problem with Deepwater Horizon was that it so utterly overwhelmed the natural processes that normally deal with the seeps. So much so that it was not clear how badly the ecosystem would be affected, or for how long. Once well enough dispersed that with enough oxygen in the water, additional nutrients and warm enough water, bacteria would eat the oil. But residual contamination of the area with tar, and dangers of hypoxia creating large areas of dead sea, with damage to the fisheries - it could have been very bad. It wasn’t as bad as all that, but it sure wasn’t good. As it is, the very slow replenishment rate of oxygen in deep water was a significant worry.

The core of the Earth contains molten nickel and iron. You wouldn’t want gobs of molten nickel in your living room, even though it came from the ground, right?

In the water, oil kills most everything. It gets in the food chain, which can make things inedible. Those wonder bacteria that eat oil suck the oxygen out of the water such that things can’t live there anymore.

But you’re right, if there is money to be made it doesn’t matter for jack shit what the environmental consequences are, so be sure to vote Romney.

To try another analogy: can you think of something that comes out of YOU that you wouldn’t want to put back into yourself?

Much better than the answer I was going to provide.

Microbes that consume oil also deplete oxygen in the water; so even when dispersed enough to avoid killing fish by direct toxicity, oxygen depletion can still kill all kinds of aquatic animals.

The toxins from oil (including various heavy metals) in the water also enter the food chain, at which point you either:

-let people eat it, making them sick, or

-disallow commercial fishing, putting people out of work.

Excuse me for the vulgar analogy but this is like saying - that it is okay to take your fecal matter and rub it on your face since it came from your body to begin with. Oil spills do not return the spilled Oil to oil reservoirs - it distributes it on the earths surface from where it finds it way to drinking water and other water sources crucial for life and our environment.

This is part of my aggravation with the new age people who feel that anything that is ALL NATURAL is by definition a perfect product. Nature produces oil, mercury, venom and cyanide. Nature can produce bad stuff.

But then again, “Twice an Exxon Valdez spill worth of oil [naturally] seeps into the Gulf of Mexico every year.” (Site.)

Sure, but that’s spread out over an entire year and about 500,000 square miles. The average American probably has around ~100 alcoholic beverages a year. Doesn’t mean having 50 drinks tonight won’t be bad for me.

Uh, yeah. The crucial point being that it’s dangerous for *surface *life to have large quantities of an essentially foreign substance in *its *environment. The Earth itself is not alive, and crude oil is not Gaia’s shit. :smiley:

The biggest danger from ocean spills is the way that oil & water don’t mix. Consequently even a small amount spilled into water will spread out immensely across its surface (and not easily break down). Years ago one of the Manhattan Project’s physicists did a science show on PBS and he demonstrated this by pouring like a teaspoon of vegetable oil onto a pond and showing how incredibly large the slick became.