You are, I think, reading my posts through some heavily tinted glasses – glasses tinted with your own bias.
I am happily proposing all sorts of theories. I notice you don’t mind (or, perhaps, even notice) when I do the same thing with theories that don’t help Zimmerman. Merely proposing a theory is intended to unseat you, and the people who are firmly in the “Zimmerman is innocent” camp, from their perches. Because I have said, and continue to say, that without Zimmerman’s statement, the autopsy report, the eyewitness statements – all of them – and the EMT report, any attempt to craft a story and say, “This is certainly what happened!” are ludicrous.
So if you say, “This is certainly what happened,” my response is to craft a hypothetical and ask you why it couldn’t be true.
Of course, your response to such challenges is to simply insist, over and over, that it couldn’t, no matter what evidence might support it.
To answer your first question:
My first post to the thread titled “Lying Whore,” was #182. It responded to another poster’s statement that false rape allegations were rare:
My post went on to reply to another comment by the same poster, who expressed outrage that there was victim blaming going on; she said she had a friend who had been raped and was seeing a similar pattern. I replied:
So my initial post to that thread showed that my disbelief at that point had to do with contradictory factual elements in her story, and had nothing to do with her race.