Caveat that I haven’t read all 640 replies, but in the SDMB liberals can be flagrantly abusive of conservatives, eg calling them MAGATs, but the reverse doesn’t seem to hold true. Responding that an opinion holder, who is not directly a SDMB poster, is suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome is unfriendly. However, the correlation between MAGAT and maggot is even more unfriendly. MAGAT seems to be acceptable. Trump Derangement Syndrome seems to be unacceptable.
I enjoy robust debate. It’s hard arguing against 10-1 odds, but that’s part of the fun. But when one side can be flagrantly abrasive, but the other side has to deal with administrative difficulties perhaps related to the abrasive terms they’ve used, it seems unfair.