Why is importing/exporting guitars forbidden?

I was going through various forums and shops trying to find a shop that would import a guitar for me (a Japan-only variant of ESP’s Eclipse model), and found that importing/exporting guitars is apparently quite frowned upon. I read that

and I was wondering if anyone knows why this is so? It’s not just US->UK, this also seems to apply to Japan->US. I can’t think of a really good reason other than the possibility of driving up prices for artist signature models (for instance trying to up the price of a Metallica guitar to be sold to a country with a larger/smaller fanbase) or something like that.

And if you happen to know of any shops that are willing to import and ship… :wink:

Just a WAG on my part, but it may have something to do with the wood (and any potential “little passengers” in the wood).

Other than that, I got nothin’.

I guess, based on the wording of the clause you post, that it’s not a prohibition imposed by a government but a contractual obligation included in ther contract between ESP and its dealers. Maybe those guitars are sold at higher prices in the US than elsewhere, and the manufacturer wants to avoid re-imports of cheaper exported guitars.

But just a WAG.

I’m with Schnitte. Here are the only US limitations on shipping guitars that I could find:

http://www.fws.gov/permits/faqs/FaqFGH.shtml

ESP’s FAQs include this:

I think there is a grammatical error here, because it doesn’t make sense, and they meant to say:

No, only the models shown on this website are available for sale in the USA. Models available in other countries are only available for those markets.

So the reason appears to be that they want to strictly control how their axes are marketed.

(Camera companies distinguish equipment made for specific markets, but but they do not outright prohibit selling in another market. There may be warranty issues, though. This is called “gray market” and there are probably a jillion Google hits on that.)

Guitar manufacturers are noted for imposing rather arbitrary and restrictive contracts on their official dealers. When I bought a Taylor, the company was enforcing a clause that their retail dealers could not advertise prices for new Taylors on the web. The dealers were annoyed as hell about it, but there wasn’t much they could do. Taylor seems to have since relented, but that sort of thing seems common for the business. In general, “name” manufacturers of low volume specialty type merchandise often seem to get dictatorial with their dealers.

This is mostly a manufacturers restriction.

The profit margins in the music game are large, there is never a shortage of folk wanting a slice of the action so importers can set the conditions of sale they want, things like not allowing any returns back to the manufacturer at all, so the end seller having to carry all the burden of warranty returns is not unusual.

The guitar industry is not particularly fragmented either, it is dominated by two or three huge major players that have several differant brands, so that Jackson, Charvell, and the cheapo Hondo are all part of the same group Samick, despite catering to vastly differing markets. In the case of Samick they also own a lot of other brands such as Kahler, Gorilla, Grover etc along with a wide range of other electronic devices, so if you upset this conglomerate, not only do you lose the right to sell their guitars, you also lose the right to sell a huge range of other stuff too, which could easily mean the end of your business.

Floyd Rose and Kahler, despite appearing to be competing for the same market, are not as far apart from each other as you might think.

Guitars are very much cheaper in the US than the UK, and the manufacturers have artificially hyped up prices here, by at least one third higher for the same spec instrument, and this sets up a situation that is ripe for parallel imports and grey imports.
Any dealer found out soon finds they can’t get stock from anywhere at all, the big manufacturers somehow seem to not be able to sell to anyone who has upset one of the other big manufacturers.

What I’m really saying is that in many ways, the musical instrument industry operates like a cartel, they do not compete as aggressively against each other as you might suppose, smaller manufacturers that do well don’t tend to stay independant for long, they get bought out.

Those smaller custom makers may be very well known, but in terms of the value of goods they shift, its a vanishingly small percentage compared to the big manufacturers. Some seemingly competing brands are made in the same factories in places such as Korea, but they are made for differant music merchandising corperations, examples such as,

The largest guitar maker Samick have been badging their guitars as “Epiphone/Gibson”, “Washburn”, “Hamer”, “Slammer”, “Kima”, “Danelectro”, “Archer”, “Ibanez”, “Rogue”, “Hohner”, “Slammer”, “Memphis”, “Montana”, “Grand”, “Dean”, “Johnson”, “Commodore”, “Hondo”, “Cruise”, “Kramer”, “Karera”, “Sterling”, “Lyon”, “Mitchell”, “Music Drive”, “Santa Rosa”, “Jay Turser”, “DeArmond”, “Abilene”, “Shredder”, “Sigma”, “Sebring”, “Eagle”, “Rokker”, “Joshua”, “Mr. Potato”

That list would give many guitarists a bit of a shock, all those names made in just one factory and just one manufacturer shows just what a stranglehold that these companies have and its why they can dictate terms.

With regards to Epiphone and Kramer, they’ve moved away from using Samick and have been making guitars in different plants in Korea and China for the past few years, with a goal of having everything made at an Epiphone plant in China.