Which could only be done once someone’s worked out fairly complete proposals for what the new structure and system would be. I’m all in favour of citizen’s commissions and the like to work on such issues, but it would still depend on a major input from people who’ve got experience of making the existing system work.
Aldiboronti, what an extremely brilliant idea, abolish all the systems without knowing what to replace it with. I’m absolutely sure nothing would go wrong there.
My advice, and it’s offered in the spirit of friendship, is to actually try to think before suggesting political reform.
Care to point out where I said anything would be abolished until such reform had been deliberated upon and decided? I await your reply with interest.
You kind of suggest that in post #16:
The New Hampshire House of Representatives is also very large proportionally. Each member represents about 3300 people: New Hampshire House of Representatives - Wikipedia