Why isn't Phillip the King?

Unwelcome.

After Victoria became queen, 

— Wikipedia

They did make up in later years, after Victoria’s children were born.

The Duchess of Kent – Victoria wasn’t even a year old when her father died.

A fun bit of trivia: When were there two women, mother and daughter, each of whom was entitled to be called “Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth”?

The obvious answer is During the 50-year period 1952-2002. Queen Elizabeth (née Bowes-Lyon) , widow of King George VI, and her daughter (née Windsor) the Queen (regnant).

But there was a prior instance. During the six and a half years ending four months and four days before Columbus discovered America, Queen Elizabeth (née Woodville), widow of King Edward IV, was mother to Queen Elizabeth (of York), consort of King Henry VII.

Going a bit further off-topic: IIRC, Parliament has been considering a same-sex marriage bill. Does it contain any provisions unique to the Royal Family? Would the British public likely be accepting of a gay, married monarch?

How far down the line of succession does one have to go to the first openly gay person?

What’s the Church of England’s position? Because the monarch is considered to be Head of the Church (aka, Defender of the Faith), I would imagine that would play a huge part of it.

William was completely unrelated to the line of succession. But as pointed out by Alessan, he had a lot of troops.

William’s mother, Mary, was James II’s older sister. When he invaded in 1688, he was fourth in line to the throne, behind the newborn James Francis Edward (“The Old Pretender”), Mary (William’s wife), and Anne.

While this is true (and noted upthread), the “he” in RealityChuck’s post referenced Prince Philip, the present Duke of Edinburgh, not William – inaccurately, as was also dealt with upthread.