Wow, what a picture-perfect example of imagined right-wing persecution. A mod tells both posters to cut it out, explicitly quoting both of them, and it’s “moderation on the side of the liberals posting”.
I apologize. You’d think that after so many years of seeing “I’m not gonna show you my evidence 'cause you’d only dismiss it!” posts I would get used to them…but I’ll watch myself in the future.
Marley’s doing the best he can, given the circumstances and his obvious bias. I don’t think any of us could do better.
But let’s not take that to mean that this discussion is unbiased. That was my main point.
lycopersiyum, I’m giving you a warning for ignoring my instruction to stop discussing the moderation. And I don’t want to see any more posts about the off-topic comments either.
Does it sound as if Marley was angrier with my opponent than he was with me? He only called ME out. Neither of we posters made a personal attack, but Marley felt the need to call out MY post as something he felt objectionable.
I’ll happily leave you to your circle-jerk. I never insulted anyone, but I’m about to get silenced. When you cut down people that disagree with you, be assured that you will be cut down just as soon as it is possible.
You asked for cites, you got them, multiple times. It’s a fact that Chick-Fil-A gives millions of dollars to groups such as the FRC. If you were not aware of that before, too bad, but it’s a fact that no one denies. It’s also a fact that the FRC is commonly referred to as a hate group, and is classified as a hate group by the organization who keeps tabs on that kind of stuff, the SPLC.
Do you dispute any of those facts?
lycopersiyum is banned. Back to your regularly scheduled thread.
::Feigns surprise at how this ended.::
Ah, internet martyrdom. All the self righteousness of being a martyr, without any actual suffering or risk.
Faked emotions? Typical liberal hypocrisy.
lycopersiyum, SPLC’s opposition to FRC is both well-documented and well-known. They’ve served the ball, and it’s now and obviously in FRC’s court to dispute their charges. If SPLC is lying, surely FRC has documentation that they’re lying. If they’re otherwise deceiving, similarly such documentation must exist.
SPLC is liberal, sure, but they’re not famous for lying. They’re famous for their excellent research. Dismissing them for their perspective is ridiculous. If you want to dismiss them, you need to bring more than an ad hominem.
Edit nevermind…