Why not have a national ID card?

Yes, I would submit that you have the (moral, obviously, not legal) right to evade it. Not only that, but , depending on the circumstances possibly the moral duty to evade it.

Why do folks still continue to assume that if we have a draft in the US it will only include young men? How could we justify excluding young women, since there are already a significant number serving on active duty in the military?

Also, about social security numbers in the US…

For one thing, not everyone has one. Railroad workers, for example, continue to use their own separate retirement account that pre-dates social security. The Amish are exempted from social security. So one can exist as a full citizen of the US without having one, even if in many circumstances it has become a de facto national ID number.

And while it may be asked for seldom does it have to be given. I have, for over 20 years, refused to have it put on my driver’s license (although many a DMV worker has expressed surprised that I don’t wan the “convenience” - convenience for whom? Identity thieves?). When I am asked for it I always inquire why do you want this? and is it truly required?

And, as identity theft increases there is more and more resistance to divulging personal information. Due to a very recent change in the law, my health insurance company will no longer be able to use SS#'s as patient ID numbers so starting next year my SS# comes off my health insurance card.

While many Americans do (sometimes foolishly in my opinon) give it out casually some of us do not and consider it confidential.

Avoiding this scenario is why I suggested an identity document the size of a book (and not a small book) for the few cases where there is a legitimate need for it (e.g. when voting).

The scenario clairobscur described is not in any way inconvenient, unpleasant, or dangerous to civil liberties. Why is it something you would want to “avoid”?

“the police stormed in and checked everybody”
“black and arab-looking people are much more likely to be checked”

Your definition of “civil liberties” appears to fit Sarek’s description of Klingon justice – “a unique point of view”.

It’s because some guy wrote a nice sci-fi book about an all knowing government and it scared the shit out of people. Now, people think that since they read it, it MUST be true. And now they are so damned paranoid about Big Brother coming to life one day and “controlling” their lives.