So if I declare war on, say Arnold Schwar…ger, then, firstly I know i’m crazy, but secondly, are we at war?
OK, I realize that sounds silly. So I’ll add something to it. Lets assume that a massive army of T-1000’s came from the future which paved Arni’s way to the White House. Am I now at war with the USA?
(dont’ worry everyone, I got my hands on a couple of those liquid-nitro beuties that will kick any T-100’s ass!)
My point is:
Terrorism is terrorism is terrorism, there is no warfare about it, and no excuses for it.
If a suicide bomber targeted a political prick, then there would hardly be an issue. If this same suicide bomber got 5 civilians in the process (2Thick seems to like this number so i’ll stick to it - why make up a number when you’ve got one already made up for you?), then we can start talking warfare. But specifically targeting civilians is a long way from warfare - it is much closer to MURDER.
FairDink : “… But specifically targeting civilians is a long way from warfare - it is much closer to MURDER.”
Semantics, Fairdink , semantics.
killing babies, innocent children, and pregnant women is not** close** to MURDER…
Agreed. Appologies… GENOCIDE.