In this thread gouda linked to a few articles concerning the EU’s attempt to have “control” of the internet handed over by the US to the UN. An example is this article. In a nutshell, there is a move to wrest the internet from the US to place it in the hands of the UN.
Keeping in mind this isn’t the Pit, I’ll just say I trust very little the UN does with anything they are entrusted with. But that has little to do with the purpose of this thread. So I’m honestly going to keep an open mind in reading responses to this. (No, really. Just trust me)
So from what I understand, in the simplest terms, is the “control” should be somehow transferred from the US to the UN. Here’s where the questions arise. First let me say that I use the quote marks since it seems just about every country in the world has host servers. Secure and unsecured.
If Russia has a network set up offline any network “controlled” by the US (and they do, we don’t have unfettered access to their defense systems) they should certainly be able to handle what the internet does by doing it on their own. Same with any of the EU countries. What is the “control” the US has over the internet that any other country can’t reproduce? It can’t be lack of tech know-how. The fundamentals of the internet are seemingly known by millions.
I know that ICANN is somehow involved, and I’ll slog through those links. But suspecting it’ll be a highly tech-intensive endeavor, I also wanted to post this to get the argument in layman’s terms.
Decades ago the US, with a big boost from the Army, came up with a practical use of networking to keep information flowing should a major city(s) be obliterated. Simplified, of course, but how would you word it with one sentance?
Anyway, I’ve never seen even a joking argument that the US didn’t invent the internet as we know it today. (Save the Gore jokes, heard 'em). So why should the US give up whatever “control” we have of it? It’s ours, [Bob Zany]Bay-Bay[/BZ]!
There are Islamic sites that post screeds and videos of killing people for political causes. They somehow are accessable over networks. Presumedly over what we know as the internet. There are sites that will explain, in detail, not only how to build a nuclear bomb, but where to but the supplies. If the US really controlled the internet, why not just shut the sites down?
I know I have to be missing something in this, hence the thread.
Why should the UN be given whatever control over the internet the US is claimed to have? The US made the concept feasable and profitable. (Maybe part of the answer.) How is the web suffering and what about the internet is being held back due to control of the concept?