People who are satisfied with a Bluetooth mouse have many options, yes. So are people who are satisfied with a USB-C cable. Those aren’t the question. The question is about why there are so few wireless mice that use a USB-C dongle.
I guess reasons suggested are:
- The market is small, because enough people are satisfied with Bluetooth.
- The market is small because many computers still have a usb a port
- The market is small because it would cost more. (Does it cost more to make a USB-C dongle? There are still lots of options for USB-A dongles )
- The dongle will likely stick out farther (or cost more to make) so they aren’t as attractive as option
- Something else?
The first is unconvincing because there remains an enormous number of mice with USB-A dongles. The second might be true, especially if the situation changes quickly. Just market lag. The third is unconvincing. There are lots of gaming mice on the market that cost more than $100. People are willing to pay for the mouse they want. At least, enough people are to create a market. The Matias mouse linked proves that it’s possible to build a svelt USB-C dongle, but maybe it costs more? Or has other issues?