In this photo of an X-47B UAV being launched from a carrier, the windshield is recessed. Wouldn’t this be inefficient aerodynamically right off the bat?
I know that ballistic and ABM missiles expose their IR and other optical units post-boost phase, but the speeds here are obviously smaller.
*I just realized that the word “drone” has replaced UAV in the public lexicon, if “UAV” ever was there. It’s a shame, because I’d think “drone” would be better than the coming unmanned attack aircraft ( although this one apparently is on its way, unless that’s PR/disinformation.
Actually, I think it would be an interesting etymological project.
Yeah, intake. I also hasten to add that that thing is pretty badass in a scary, uncomfortable way. I’m envisioning hordes of these things being unleashed on all manner of unsuspecting people while we continue to be ever more detached emotionally from engaging in warfare.
I’m pretty sure that’s not a windshield. It’s the engine intake. It looks like a windshield because of perspective: The curve that looks like the surface is actually the curvature of the far edge of the inlet, and the “reflection glint” is the shadow transition from the sun-illuminated inner surface and the shaded inner surface (shaded by that same far edge of the inlet).
Actually, looking at that thing, where are its recon/optical pods?
I know it’s testing flight takeoff and landing and is not operational for missions, but no operator at all is about looking through something? Barring that, GPS, or what? I can’t believe landing on a choppy flight deck can be done with GPS and radar/beacons but the DOD is smart when it wants to be.
ETA: Other thread on the bird merge ahead…