Nope, more like the baby’s in the batter. :o
I was gonna nominate for thread title of the year.
You make a dead man cum? Not with the help of medical science you won’t.
That was kind of what I was thinking as well. Sperm donations don’t grant any sort of visitation rights to the donor’s family, so why would a testicle donation?
Much better rhythm.
Why would this need to be treated any different legally than donating sperm “anonymously” through a clinic? The resulting child doesn’t have any inheritance rights from the donor or his family.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Don’t get me started…
Can you sign a contract with a clinic giving them exclusive rights to your sperm?
For me, it would depend heavily on the royalty agreement.
Reminds me of an Ann Landers column, from a couple hundred years ago. A married couple was expecting a baby. The mother-to-be explained that she had had a nose job several years prior.
She wanted to know if her baby would inherit her new nose or her old one?
~VOW
Testicular Ethics
Although that might work better as the title of a Dan Brown novel.
Or Ethicular Testes!
(now we’re just getting silly…)
~VOW
I’ve tried that, but they STILL refuse to help me get it out.
But you can get falsies!
Hopefully, the father’s…
I have no idea. But what does it matter?
If I go produce my donation in a little cup, and the clinic uses it to produce 1000 children, that’s only really different in scale versus donating my nads and having some other guy produce a few kids using them after I’m dead.
Neither option grants my parents, brother, aunts, uncles or cousins any rights, expectations or anything at all to do with either the thousand sperm donation children, or the handful produced by some guy using the actual transplanted organs.
Nah, guys. The double dactyl wins.
Why couldn’t they be required to have a vasectomy?