This lady is betting on it, but I thought pre-nups were typically for stuff that was brought into the marriage and that resources aquired during the marriage were usually fair game.
Well, we would have to know what the pre-nuptial said. It’s not like they’re all the same is it?
The essential caveat: I am not a lawyer:
Sailor’s right, but for the purposes of this question, let’s consider that only pre-marriage assets are addressed in the pre-nup.
In that case, the laws of the state in which the marriage took place would almost certainly come into play. States like Louisiana and Texas are community-property states, in which wages and assets gained during marriage belong to both spouses equally. So in community-property states, Kenneth Parker almost certainly would have a legitimate claim for half of Connie Parker’s Lotto winnings.
In states that are not community-property states, I’m not clear on how this would be resolved. Kenneth Parker might be SOL. Alternatively, a judge, in an effort to render a fair decision, may be willing to consider circumstances specific to the Parker’s marriage.
It’s going to depend on the language of the pre-nup and the jurisdiction. The big question is probably going to be how the jurisdiction legally classifies lottery winnings and whether she can prove that under the terms of the pre-nup the collar she bought the ticket with was her money and that the husband had no legal claim on the dollar. In addition a judge could review the agreement and decide that it’s unfair or against public policy and throw it out.
IANAL etc.
Since you won the lottery, you can afford to go out and buy a “dream team” of lawyers. We all know from history that a dream team can do anything it wants with the legal system. You can even get away with murder
Community Property State?
Was it acquired during the course of a valid marriage? Or From the rents, issues, or profits (of a community asset) thereof? Or by the expenditure of expertise/labor/effort during the marriage (which expertise/labor/effort can be a CP asset.) Just might be beyond the scope of a pre-nuptial, which typically defines what is and isn’t to be considered community property as it exists, or can be defined at that time. So, I dunno, might be, might not.