You really think men have a shadow of a chance against women in a pissing contest?
Judged on distance, yes. Judged on volume, yes (men having larger bodies, therefore larger bladders). Is there any other traditional criterion?
Unlikely, as it would require more than one Congresscritter to be in the chamber at any given time. In other words, fist-fights would intrude on time better used for fundraising.
The best part of that story is how Brooks displayed his essential chickenshit nature when challenged to a duel by Anson Burlingame (R-Mass.).
IME the women would win on frequency.
Hey, I would love to see Mitch McConnell get his ass handed to him by Harry Reid, who was a boxer and boxing coach.
Actually, women can achieve much greater distance than men. Though men do have the advantage of better aim.
If we sat down to pee, like sensible people do, aim wouldn’t even enter into it. Like hell I will.
I support this proposal, and would like to vote to bring to the floor for debate.
Higher up on the garage door. (“No hands!”)
I’d DEFINITELY watch C-SPAN if it happens.
I would too. The more than one Congressperson thing, not the fistfight thing.
Wouldn’t fist fights in Congress be a Capitol offense?
<claps>
<curtsy>
There have been fist fights in the Taiwanese Parliament and they are still functioning.
That said, I hope that neither the House or Senate sink to that level. We need to pull together.
Reminds me of that scene in Up where the two geezers duke it out. In real life I think the result would be broken hips for both of them.
I propose a friendly amendment for paintball.
Naw, McConnell would filibuster. No decision is reached, nothing gets accomplished and the crowd is left unsatisfied.
<slap> Damn, even my fantasies are stuck in real life.
I’m thinking something much more on the lines of Buzz Aldrin decking Bart Sibrel.