Why do you think we waited to put him in until the Dems were in control of Congress? Heh-heh-heh . . .
Some of the polarization of American politics has been blamed at gerrymandering, and it is true that computer modeling has advanced since the paper and pencil days of the 1970, 1980 censuses and earlier.
But for some reason, political scientists have judged the gerrymandering effect to be small. Rather, like people seem to be sorting themselves into more politically homogeneous geographic districts.
Cite. Drilling down, it seems that some educational sorting is going on, as college grads etc move to high tech areas, and gentrification pushes out the less educated. And education unsurprisingly correlates with political preferences. Then again, perhaps it’s the urban experience of rubbing shoulders with people who don’t look like you that shapes political outlook.
Regardless, it seems that political minorities tend to shift towards the views of the local political majority, as the majorities themselves become more extreme.
Social circles aren’t entirely geographic, either. Even if your next-door neighbors have politics opposite your own, you probably don’t go to the same church as them, or work the same place, or engage in the same hobbies, or whatever else. And all of those will have at least some correlation with politics.
Specter approached but doesn’t seem to want to switch.
Ah well. For now.
Specter announced he won’t support breaking a filibuster on the Employee Free Choice Act (contentious pro-union legislation). He had previously voted for the legislation, so I’d say his reversal here pretty strongly suggests he’s going to try and hang in there as a member of the GOP.
Should be a very interesting race next year.
I think it’s more likely a sign that he’s calling it quits (and burnishing his resume for a retired-GOP-politican job), given the political realities on the ground in Pennsylvania.
I think his only options at this point are to retire or prepare to be primaried. Either outcome is good for the Democrats in Pennsylvania. Even if he survives the primary, I don’t see him winning without the help of labor.
It makes it clear that he won’t switch to run as a Democrat anyway, and with that possibility removed it is a high probability that Rendell will run on the Dem side. Rendell would stay out of the way if Specter was going to run as a Dem but staying out when Specter is likely to even not win the primary? I don’t think he feels he owes his old boss that much.
He’ll be like 81 in 2010, I doubt he needs to hedge for a second career beyond elder statesman. I really think this indicates he plans on giving a GOP primary run a try.
And he may yet win, I suspect the GOP will at least start to realize their current efforts to run out the moderates is costing them more votes then its gaining before the next election.