Inspired by this thread, this is a post I’ve been meaning to make for a long time but did not 'till I saw it.
In The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, William Shirer several times harps on what in context is the hypocrisy of the Nazis who expound on moral purity while at the same time looking the other way at homosexuals in their midst or partaking of it themselves.
But he doesn’t even use such mild language. Instead he talks about them being “perverts” and such. I can’t remember the exact language but to my modern eyes it seems quite off-putting.
– Do you find that his homophobia in TRaFot3R affects your appreciation of his analysis of Intra-Nazi party politics? (I assume it doesnt affect your appreciation of the rest of his prose)
– Was this amount of homophobia standard for that time, and as such, does it still make you think less of Shirer’s character?
As for myself, I’m not sure about question number one. It’s distracting at least. But I don’t think that I am quite able to forgive him for such blatant homophobia even if it were common at the time, even if it only happens a handful of times in the book, and if the language is not as condemnatory as it could have been.
That said, my opinion of his character is not lessened by as much as it would have been if he would have written the same prose today.