Wisconsin's Union Bill (Act 10) is in fact constitutionally sound

[Really_Not_All_That_Bright]

@Bricker

We like them better. We are willing to give more concessions because we hold their jobs in higher regard.

Fair enough.

@Shodan

Because it is more important that they not go on strike, and since their legal opportunities to go on strike has been limited in Wisconsin since 1971. (Cite - pdf.)

Regards,
Shodan

How does that relate in any way to the question I asked?

[Shodan]

@Really_Not_All_That_Bright

How does that relate in any way to the question I asked?

By answering it.

Regards,
Shodan

[Hentor_the_Barbarian]

The Brickey Shuffle:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&ei=KelWU_PiHqzQsQSX5IBA&url=http://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DWdhSiQcGEU4&cd=2&ved=0CC8QtwIwAQ&usg=AFQjCNHEtdtFNZVWxlkS3RrfxdOiKwLCxA

[tomndebb]

@Hentor_the_Barbarian

The Brickey Shuffle:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&ei=KelWU_PiHqzQsQSX5IBA&url=http://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DWdhSiQcGEU4&cd=2&ved=0CC8QtwIwAQ&usg=AFQjCNHEtdtFNZVWxlkS3RrfxdOiKwLCxA

Do not post this or similar stupidity, again, in Great Debates.

If you have an argument, post it. If you just do not like a poster, go open a thread in The BBQ Pit.

[ /Moderating ]

[Cyros]

[quote=“Shodan, post:60, topic:686624”]

Because it is more important that they not go on strike, and since their legal opportunities to go on strike has been limited in Wisconsin since 1971. (Cite - pdf.)/QUOTE]

I seem to be suffering from a lack of imagination as I cannot see how expanding the breadth of what one can collectively bargain for results in a lessening of the chance of a strike. It would, on first blush, seem to me that the opposite would hold true. The more which is under the umbrella of collective bargaining would increase the opportunity for disagreement and a strike situation.