A cursory glance at your basic wood louse would probably lead most people to believe that they’re more closely related to millipedes than crabs. Instead the opposite is true.
I’m not arguing the taxonomy–I just don’t want to do a whole lot of digging on the web. Simply: What are the features that they have in common with crustaceans, and what are some differences between them and millipedes?
Decapods constitute one Order or IIRC Suborder of Crustacea, albeit the one with almost all the “popular” crustaceans – shrimp, lobsters, crabs, hermit crabs, etc. (Isopods and barnacles constitute two other orders, and there are a bunch of additional ones that will not be vamiliar unless you’re a plankton geek.
But while Giles’s point about Decapods was in error, the five appendage head structure he describes is indeed the defining characteristic of Crustacea. (There’s a fair amount of discussion on this from an interested layman’s perspective in Gould’s book on the Burgess Shale, Wonderful Life, if anyone wants to read further on it without wading through unexplained technical jargon – the reason being that much of the Burgess Shale fauna was erroneously classified as crustaceans without the defining characters.)
The simplest way that a layperson, or anyone else for that matter, can tell that a slater isn’t a millipede is by flipping on on its back. Millipedes have one pair of legs on each body segment, crustaceans don’t. Flip a slater on its back and you will see that the last several segments quite clearly do not have any legs and thus they can’t be millipedes. It’s a fast, simple accurate technique that cna be readily used in the field without an specialised equipment like microscopes for counting the mouthparts.