World War II German Soldier Heinrich Serveloh

the amphibious invasion by the allies at normandy on june 6, 1944 set several all-time records. 160,000 allied troops were landed from around 4,300 landing craft. 12,000 allied war planes and transports sortied out. most of the top ground, air and naval commanders were british. the operation was jointly planned by the staff of general of the armies eisenhower (an unofficial sixth-star general) and field marshall montgomery. montgomery was in overall command.

it was a relatively silent and bloodless invasion. the biggest invasion in history went largely un-noticed. un-noticed and bloodless, except for skirmishes by advanced allied paratroopers against german soldiers on patrol, and the omaha beach landings. very often books mention briefly that allies met the stiffest opposition at omaha beach and around 2,500 american soldiers were killed.

the “stiffest oppostion” consisted of three machine gun positions and only one was directly facing the landing americans. that one was designated w-62 (resistance nest 62) with an mg-42 light machinegun (7.92mm belt-fed, air-cooled, bipod-mounted) manned by corporal heinrich serveloh.

serveloh had a clear view of the lower ground, the wide sandbar and the beach. the american landing craft dropped their front doors down, allowing american troops to jump into chest-deep water and wade with all their weapons and packs around 20 meters to the beach. serveloh was around 500 meters away.

serveloh opened fire with his mg-42 at 5AM. his commanding officer advised him to let the americans wade in the water in straight rows from their craft before opening fire. once they reached the beach, they would spread out. that is exactly what serveloh did. he enfiladed countless rows of american soldiers wading helpless in the water. before long, the wave swells hitting the beach were filled with dead, bobbing US troops. behind him, his 19 companions in w-62 kept passing ammo to servelo’s weapon. his machinegun barrel started overheating early and he had no spare barrel. the barrel was already setting fire to the dry grass close to his gun. he paused only to wait for the next landing craft to stop and discharge more hapless soldiers, giving him time to cool his weapon.

w-62 stopped firing 9 hours later at around 3PM. corporal serveloh had exhausted his supply of 12,000 machine gun rounds. his exact kill on d-day will never be known but both sides estimated that he killed between 1,500 and 2,000 american soldiers in 9 hours, and accounted for around 83% of allied casualties at omaha beach. it was a singular achievement for an infantry soldier who was at the right place at the right time, and performed his duty admirably.

serveloh was captured by the americans during their retreat as the allies consolidated their hold on the five beaches. americans nicknamed him “the beast of omaha beach.” he was subjected to forced labor in american farms and later in road construction in britain. he was released in 1947. during his captivity, he refused to talk about his experience at omaha even with his fellow-german soldiers out of shame and guilt. most of his american captors knew what he had done but treated him decently.

in germany he went back to live and work in their family farm. married and had children. he made friends with at least one omaha beach survivor, david silva, who took three bullets to the chest. silva’s account was mentioned in cornelius ryan’s book “the longest day.” that is how serveloh knew of him. silva chose to reside in germany.

serveloh travelled many times to omaha beach to pray for those he had killed. he had never made any request to be forgiven for what he had done but silva pronnounced his forgiveness in confidence.

heinrich serveloh died on january 14, 2006 aged 82. this doper feels he should be specially honored for his skill, his dedication, and above all, his humanity.

my apologies, gents. it’s Severloh. some honor i’m giving him.

Apparently a PEXer agrees with you.

funny how we have similar namings.

mac_bolan00
cretinous00
:wink:

Capitalising his name would be honour enough.

now i feel better. :smiley:

Am I missing the whoosh in the OP? Or is he seriously suggesting that a soldier who machine gunned two thousand people should be honored for his humanity?

it’s easy to miss it (heck i even spelled him wrong.) in all honesty, i’m not expecting people to gasp at his having machinegunned that many american soldiers, nor am i provoking something from anyone. from my crude narrative, i had hoped to convey a man’s singular experience and the turmoil it brought.

So it was intended as irony?

All I can say is, the lesson here is that if this guy were on our side, he’d be considered a hero for what he did, just like Ben Salomon and John Basilone. Provides some perspective.

I have no problem accepting that Basilone, Salomon, and Severloh were all good soldiers who performed their duties. But machine gunning people is not what I’d call an act of humanity regardless of which side a soldier is on.

^^
yes

^
yes, i agree. the similarity with basilone is that both faught to the last round; the german with his mauser, while the american with his .45 and both got away clean. basilone wasn’t able to make an autobiography, did he?

purely in combat terms. if you can hold off that many enemy troops with small arms up to the time your ammo runs out and you are still able to escape, it indicates a serious error in judgement by the other side. at normandy, the brass simply estimated a 5,000-man casualty count on d-day statistically “acceptable.” no one expected one man with a machine gun to provide the “blip.”

regarding little nemo’s last post, humanity often shows itself in later years but it’s always there. a quick googling will tell you exactly how severloh felt in the morning of june 6, 1944 “we had to stop them on the beach or else the war is over. [rommel’s instructions.]” severloh simply said “it was them or me.” with that he soldiered admirably. when his ammo for the mg-42 ran out he had to use his carbine. the first GI he killed at close range finally told him he was killing humans, not mere dots on the beach.

If humanity is always there, then why single out Severloh?

I’m just not seeing the point of this thread. Okay, there was a soldier and he killed a lot of people during a war. There’s millions of people you can say the same thing about.

Severloh was fighting for a bad cause and his side lost the battle and the war. Everyone would have been better off if he had abandoned his post at the first sign of the invasion.

just not so. i’m sorry if my thread doesn’t grab you in any way but your contention is about as wrong as one can imagine. i’ve read very books telling that a soldier surrendered because he knew the war was lost, or that his country’s leadership led them to a ruinous war. they surrender when the battle is lost and there’s no escape. they fight for their lives. they fight for their buddies. and they fight to protect innocents. duty is very much a part of one’s human conscience

When your duty is helping to keep Hitler in power, then your duty has been misguided. Even Germany actually came out better from losing WWII then it would have been if it had won the war.

this is all just opinion. tell me, did the iraqi soldiers fighting the allies in 1991 fight a just war? maybe, maybe not. they were the clear aggressors from everyone’s point-of-view. now, what about those iraqi soldiers who fought the US invasion in 2003, when saddam did basically nothing wrong? were they still misguided because they still had hussein for a president?

Objectively speaking, you’re right. Fortunately, I am not objective, and have no interest in being.

There seem to be few witnesses to Severloh’s heroics. (Being on the losing side lends to that.) But experience shows the right man with the right training in the right place does most of the killing. His story, if true, is simply an extreme example of a well-known effect.

Moral courage is more complex than physical courage.